A qualitative descriptive study on toxic leadership in military settings

Abstract:In the early 2000s, the study of toxic leadership gained significant attention, especially in military settings. However, there is a lack of in-depth understanding of the experiences of leaders and subordinates with different ranks, specialties, years of service, and genders working in a military context where toxic leadership was perceived as the predominant leadership style. This qualitative descriptive study explores toxic leadership in military settings using a broad literature review, semi-structured interviews, and thematic analysis. It captures the perception and experience of active-duty military personnel who have encountered toxic leadership. The study highlights the importance of recognizing toxic leadership and aims to raise awareness about the perceived effects of this toxicity on the well-being and performance of subordinates. This study uses the toxic triangle model of leadership ostracism and the leader’s member exchange theory. This study calls for a positive change in the organizations impacted by leader toxicity. By delving into participants’ experiences, the common patterns, themes, and variations in the perceived negative influence of toxic leadership on subordinates and the underlying factors contributing to toxicity are explored. The results provide valuable insights into personnel's subjective experiences, well-being, and performance outcomes. This calls for organizations to adopt healthier leadership practices and develop a culture promoting subordinates’ well-being and high performance. The findings also reflect recommendations of the military personnel to develop policies, training, and individual coping mechanisms that enhance personnel effectiveness and mental health.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    The impact of exposure to morally injurious events on posttraumatic stress symptoms among Israeli combat Veterans: a longitudinal moderated mediation model of moral injury outcomes and dispositional forgiveness

    Abstract: Background: Exposure to potentially morally injurious events (PMIEs) during military service can lead to moral injury (MI) outcomes and posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS). This longitudinal study examined the relationships between PMIE exposure, MI outcomes, and PTSS among Israeli combat veterans, and the potential protective role of dispositional forgiveness in these associations. Method: Participants were 169 Israeli combat veterans who participated in a six-year longitudinal study with four measurement points (T1: 12 months before enlistment, T2: Six months following enlistment- pre-deployment, T3: 18 months following enlistment- post-deployment, and T4: 28 months following discharge). Participants’ characteristics were assessed via semi-structured interviews (T1) and validated self-report measures (T2-T4) between 2019-2024. Results: Approximately 36% of participants reported exposure to PMIEs during service, with 13% exceeding the clinical threshold for probable PTSD at T4. PMIE-Betrayal at T3 was positively associated with MI outcomes of shame and trust violation at T4. The indirect effect of PMIEs on PTSS through MI outcome-Shame depended on forgiveness levels. Among veterans with low forgiveness, higher exposure to PMIE-Betrayal was associated with increased MI shame, which was linked to more severe PTSS. Conversely, for those with high forgiveness, exposure to PMIE-Self and Other was associated with decreased MI shame and subsequently reduced PTSS. Conclusion: Dispositional forgiveness moderates the relationship between PMIE exposure and MI outcomes, particularly shame, which mediates the development of PTSS. These findings highlight forgiveness as a potential target for intervention in treating moral injury and preventing PTSS among combat veterans.