Why do they fail? A qualitative follow up study of 1000 recruits to the British Army Infantry to understand high levels of attrition (UK)

Abstract: BACKGROUND:The British Army has over 100 career employment groups to which recruits may apply. The Infantry is one of these career employment groups; it accounts for 25% of the overall strength. It is of concern that Infantry recruit attrition within the first 12 weeks of training remains consistently above 30% . Poor selection methods that lead to the enlistment of unsuitable recruits have negative financial and personal consequences, but little is known about the personal experiences of those who fail. OBJECTIVE:The aim of this research was to understand why infantry recruits choose to leave and explore the personal experiences of those that fail. METHODS:This study draws on qualitative data from the second phase of a larger mixed method study. The foci of this paper are the findings directly related to the responses of recruits in exit interviews and their Commanding Officers’ training reports. An exploratory qualitative, inductive method was used to generate insights, explanations and potential solutions to training attrition. RESULTS:What the data describes is a journey of extreme situational demands that the recruits experience throughout their transition from civilian life to service in the British Infantry. It is the cumulative effect of the stressors, combined with the recruit being dislocated from their established support network, which appears to be the catalyst for failure among recruits. CONCLUSION:There are clearly defined areas where either further research or changes to current practice may provide a better understanding of, and ultimately reduce, the current attrition rates experienced by the Infantry Training Centre.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Examination of the mental health symptoms and stigmatizing attitudes of student servicemembers and Veterans in postsecondary education

    Abstract:Student servicemembers and veterans (SSM/V) face challenges when transitioning from military service into higher education, including mental health concerns and difficulties with academic and social adjustment. This study examined mental health symptoms, adjustment to college, stigma, and help-seeking attitudes among 79 SSM/V enrolled in postsecondary education. Participants completed measures related to depression (PHQ-8), anxiety (GAD-7), posttraumatic stress (PCL-5), adjustment to college (VAC), self-stigma (SSOSH), public stigma (SSRPH), and attitudes toward seeking professional psychological help (ATSPPH-SF). Results indicated that average scores reflected mild levels of depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress. Veterans reported significantly higher levels of depressive and PTSD symptoms compared to active-duty servicemembers. Number of deployments was negatively correlated with adjustment scores. Race and ethnicity were found to be significant predictors of help-seeking attitudes. Although college adjustment was negatively correlated with depression, anxiety, and PTSD symptoms, the findings did not reach statistical significance, perhaps due to the limited variability in the sample. Most participants reported generally positive attitudes toward mental health services, though both self-stigma and perceived public stigma were present. Service utilization was high overall, with 76% of participants reporting prior mental health service use and 44% who were currently engaged in treatment at time of survey completion. Findings underscore the importance of addressing cultural factors, deployment experiences, and stigma to improve adjustment, retention, and well-being among SSM/V in postsecondary education.

    Mental Health