Substance Use Disorders Among Veterans in a Nationally Representative Sample: Prevalence and Associated Functioning and Treatment Utilization

Abstract: Objective: Several epidemiological studies have reported that veterans and nonveterans have comparable substance use disorder (SUD) prevalence and SUD treatment rates for SUD and treatments of several types. No studies have compared functioning among veterans with SUD to veterans without SUD or to nonveterans. Method: We investigated the prevalence of past-year and lifetime SUD (based on criteria from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition), overall and by substance, and estimated the association with physical and mental health functioning and treatment utilization and need among veterans and nonveterans in a nationally representative sample. Results: Predicted prevalence of any past-year SUD, with and without tobacco use disorder (TUD), among veterans was 32.9% and 17.1%, and prevalence of any lifetime SUD, with and without TUD, was 52.5 and 38.7%, respectively. Veterans had higher prevalence of past-year and lifetime SUD for some substances (e.g., tobacco, alcohol) but not others (e.g., cannabis, opioid). Lower physical and mental health functioning was found among veterans, relative to nonveterans, and participants with SUD, relative to those without SUD, and veterans with SUD reported the lowest functioning across all domains. More veterans than nonveterans received any SUD treatment and SUD treatment in specific domains (e.g., self-help). About 70% of veterans with past-year SUD did not receive treatment, but only 5.4% reported needing and not receiving treatment. Conclusions: Relative to nonveterans, veterans have higher prevalence of past-year TUD and lifetime alcohol use disorder or TUD and lower physical or mental health functioning. A minority of veterans receive SUD treatment, and few report unmet need for treatment.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Qualitative analysis of the lived experience of reproductive and pediatric health care in the military health care system

    Abstract: Introduction: Persistent inequities exist in obstetric and neonatal outcomes in military families despite universal health care coverage. Though the exact underlying cause has not been identified, social determinants of health may uniquely impact military families. The purpose of this study was to qualitatively investigate the potential impact of social determinants of health and the lived experiences of military individuals seeking maternity care in the Military Health System. Materials and methods: This was an Institutional Review Board-approved protocol. Nine providers conducted 31 semi-structured interviews with individuals who delivered within the last 5 years in the direct or purchased care market. Participants were recruited through social media blasts and clinic flyers with both maximum variation and homogenous sampling to ensure participation of diverse individuals. Data were coded and themes were identified using inductive qualitative research methods. Results: Three main themes were identified: Requirements of Military Life (with subthemes of pregnancy notification and privacy during care, role of pregnancy instructions and policies, and role of command support), Sociocultural Aspects of the Military Experience (with subthemes of pregnancy as a burden on colleagues and a career detractor, postpartum adjustment, balancing personal and professional requirements, pregnancy timing and parenting challenges, and importance of friendship and camaraderie in pregnancy), and Navigating the Healthcare Experience (including subthemes of transfer between military and civilian care and TRICARE challenges, perception of military care as inferior to civilian, and remote duty stations and international care). Conclusions: The unique stressors of military life act synergistically with the existing health care challenges, presenting opportunities for improvements in care. Such opportunities may include increased consistency of policies across services and commands. Increased access to group prenatal care and support groups, and increased assistance with navigating the health care system to improve care transitions were frequently requested changes by participants.