A comparative analysis of medically released men and women from the Canadian Armed Forces
Abstract:Â Introduction: Musculoskeletal (MSK) injuries and mental health (MH) disorders are the leading causes of medical attrition in the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF). Historically, medical attrition rates have been higher for women than men. In order to better understand the medical release trends of men and women, a descriptive analysis of the medical reasons for release was undertaken. Methods: Administrative data sources within the Department of National Defence were used to identify medically released personnel together with their primary medical diagnosis and demographic characteristics, including sex, age, and rank. The analysis included 5,180 Regular Force personnel medically released between April 1, 2014 and March 31, 2017. Results: While overall trends in the reasons for medical release were sometimes similar for men and women, statistically significant differences between the medical release reasons of men and women were found in several of the sub-groups considered. These sub-groups included non-commissioned members (NCMs), officers, Air personnel, and members who had not deployed in the 10 years prior to their release, as well as personnel in the earlier and later stages of their career. Discussion: An increased understanding of the differences between medically released men and women is important for the development of future injury and illness prevention strategies, which have the primary objective of improving the health and operational readiness of serving members, as well as a secondary objective of lowering medical attrition rates to improve overall retention in the CAF.
Abstract: Background: Exposure to potentially morally injurious events (PMIEs) during military service can lead to moral injury (MI) outcomes and posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS). This longitudinal study examined the relationships between PMIE exposure, MI outcomes, and PTSS among Israeli combat veterans, and the potential protective role of dispositional forgiveness in these associations. Method: Participants were 169 Israeli combat veterans who participated in a six-year longitudinal study with four measurement points (T1: 12 months before enlistment, T2: Six months following enlistment- pre-deployment, T3: 18 months following enlistment- post-deployment, and T4: 28 months following discharge). Participants’ characteristics were assessed via semi-structured interviews (T1) and validated self-report measures (T2-T4) between 2019-2024. Results: Approximately 36% of participants reported exposure to PMIEs during service, with 13% exceeding the clinical threshold for probable PTSD at T4. PMIE-Betrayal at T3 was positively associated with MI outcomes of shame and trust violation at T4. The indirect effect of PMIEs on PTSS through MI outcome-Shame depended on forgiveness levels. Among veterans with low forgiveness, higher exposure to PMIE-Betrayal was associated with increased MI shame, which was linked to more severe PTSS. Conversely, for those with high forgiveness, exposure to PMIE-Self and Other was associated with decreased MI shame and subsequently reduced PTSS. Conclusion: Dispositional forgiveness moderates the relationship between PMIE exposure and MI outcomes, particularly shame, which mediates the development of PTSS. These findings highlight forgiveness as a potential target for intervention in treating moral injury and preventing PTSS among combat veterans.