Knowledge Assessment of Military Personnel, Veterans, and Family Taking Dietary Supplements

Abstract: Dietary supplements (DS) pose many side effects and multiple interactions with perioperative medications, which may increase surgical morbidity and mortality. Descriptive empirical data are essentially nonexistent related to DS consumption and patient knowledge of DS. The aims of this study were to investigate the prevalence of use, type of supplements used, and the knowledge base among military beneficiaries and veterans consuming DS during the preoperative period. This descriptive cross-sectional study solicited data from 2,623 volunteer, preoperative patients at 6 different military medical centers throughout the United States. Of the 2,623 participants, 847 (32.3%) reported taking at least 1 DS. Relevant to the surgical population, 154 (18.1%) of participants reported consuming DS that are associated with an increased risk of bleeding. Importantly, we found that 89.7% of patients taking DS were not aware of any potential side effects, and 97.1% lacked knowledge regarding any potential medication interactions between the supplement consumed and their prescribed medications. This vast knowledge gap could have deleterious effects on surgical outcomes. An increase in DS research is needed, and patient education should be incorporated routinely during preoperative assessments provided by military and Veterans Affairs healthcare facilities.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Qualitative analysis of the lived experience of reproductive and pediatric health care in the military health care system

    Abstract: Introduction: Persistent inequities exist in obstetric and neonatal outcomes in military families despite universal health care coverage. Though the exact underlying cause has not been identified, social determinants of health may uniquely impact military families. The purpose of this study was to qualitatively investigate the potential impact of social determinants of health and the lived experiences of military individuals seeking maternity care in the Military Health System. Materials and methods: This was an Institutional Review Board-approved protocol. Nine providers conducted 31 semi-structured interviews with individuals who delivered within the last 5 years in the direct or purchased care market. Participants were recruited through social media blasts and clinic flyers with both maximum variation and homogenous sampling to ensure participation of diverse individuals. Data were coded and themes were identified using inductive qualitative research methods. Results: Three main themes were identified: Requirements of Military Life (with subthemes of pregnancy notification and privacy during care, role of pregnancy instructions and policies, and role of command support), Sociocultural Aspects of the Military Experience (with subthemes of pregnancy as a burden on colleagues and a career detractor, postpartum adjustment, balancing personal and professional requirements, pregnancy timing and parenting challenges, and importance of friendship and camaraderie in pregnancy), and Navigating the Healthcare Experience (including subthemes of transfer between military and civilian care and TRICARE challenges, perception of military care as inferior to civilian, and remote duty stations and international care). Conclusions: The unique stressors of military life act synergistically with the existing health care challenges, presenting opportunities for improvements in care. Such opportunities may include increased consistency of policies across services and commands. Increased access to group prenatal care and support groups, and increased assistance with navigating the health care system to improve care transitions were frequently requested changes by participants.