Exploring the Acceptability of The Together Webinar Programme for Military Partners: A Qualitative Study
Abstract: Background: Military partners appear at risk for developing psychological difficulties such as depression, generalized anxiety, and secondary trauma symptoms. Yet, evidence suggests that participants report an array of barriers that prevent them from seeking and engaging with mental health support. This includes stigma-related beliefs, work and childcare responsibilities, and distance to venue where support is offered. Introduction: The Together Webinar Programme (TTP-Webinar) was developed to increase the accessibility of mental health support for military partners. The efficacy of this program has been explored in a previous study. Materials and Methods: Data for this study were taken from 68 partners who provided qualitative feedback of the program. Thematic qualitative analysis was used to explore the views of participants about the acceptability of TTP-Webinar. Results: Four main themes were identified, namely perceived benefit, modality, general barriers, and areas for improvement. Discussion: Participants found it favorable to develop a better understanding of veterans' difficulties, to have their own difficulties normalized through sharing and discussion, and to feel part of a wider community. They also found the webinar format favorable as it increased the accessibility of support and provided them with an interactive safe platform. Conclusions: The study provides promising qualitative evidence for the use of TTP-Webinar in supporting the mental health needs of military partners.
Abstract: Background: Exposure to potentially morally injurious events (PMIEs) during military service can lead to moral injury (MI) outcomes and posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS). This longitudinal study examined the relationships between PMIE exposure, MI outcomes, and PTSS among Israeli combat veterans, and the potential protective role of dispositional forgiveness in these associations. Method: Participants were 169 Israeli combat veterans who participated in a six-year longitudinal study with four measurement points (T1: 12 months before enlistment, T2: Six months following enlistment- pre-deployment, T3: 18 months following enlistment- post-deployment, and T4: 28 months following discharge). Participants’ characteristics were assessed via semi-structured interviews (T1) and validated self-report measures (T2-T4) between 2019-2024. Results: Approximately 36% of participants reported exposure to PMIEs during service, with 13% exceeding the clinical threshold for probable PTSD at T4. PMIE-Betrayal at T3 was positively associated with MI outcomes of shame and trust violation at T4. The indirect effect of PMIEs on PTSS through MI outcome-Shame depended on forgiveness levels. Among veterans with low forgiveness, higher exposure to PMIE-Betrayal was associated with increased MI shame, which was linked to more severe PTSS. Conversely, for those with high forgiveness, exposure to PMIE-Self and Other was associated with decreased MI shame and subsequently reduced PTSS. Conclusion: Dispositional forgiveness moderates the relationship between PMIE exposure and MI outcomes, particularly shame, which mediates the development of PTSS. These findings highlight forgiveness as a potential target for intervention in treating moral injury and preventing PTSS among combat veterans.