Translating Public Health Recommendations Using the Army Design Methodology

Abstract: The U.S. Army employs over 470,000 active duty soldiers throughout the world. Although the Army also employs hundreds of public health professionals, public health recommendations are often not framed in ways that are readily actionable to senior Army leaders. This case study shows how public health findings were translated into actionable recommendations using the Army Design Methodology (ADM) and subsequently implemented by installation leadership. Following a perceived increase in suicides at Fort Wainwright, Alaska, in 2019, installation leadership requested that the U.S. Army Public Health Center conduct an epidemiological consultation. A mixed-methods approach was used to gather qualitative and quantitative data. The ADM was used to translate the findings and provide actionable recommendations for senior Army leaders. Many recommendations were implemented within a year of the report's release and included modifications to gym facilities, dining halls, and sleeping areas. Key improvements included the installation of $900,000 worth of new gym equipment in existing physical fitness facilities, increasing the basic daily food allowance by 44% to facilitate the purchase of healthy options, and the installation of blackout blinds in all barracks to ensure more restful sleep during times of peak sunlight. The ADM is well understood by senior Army leaders. Use of the ADM in future military-specific public health studies could ensure a more effective uptake and implementation of public health recommendations.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Outcomes from a posttraumatic growth-oriented program among Veterans: A quasi-experimental retrospective study

    Abstract: Objective: The present study is a retrospective quasi-experimental study to evaluate the effectiveness of the Warrior PATHH (WP) program at improving posttraumatic growth (PTG) outcomes and reducing PTSD symptoms compared to a waitlist control among a sample of Veterans. Method: Participants (n = 164) were U.S. military Veterans with a history of trauma. Participants were either undergoing the Warrior PATHH program or a waitlist. Primary outcome measures were administered at baseline and at 90-day follow-up and consisted of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory – Expanded (PTGI-X) and the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). Secondary outcome measures assessed psychosocial functioning and included measures of depression and anxiety symptoms, sleep, wellbeing, and social support. Results: Significant differences were observed between groups on the PTGI-X (F(1, 205) = 23.667, p < .001, partial η2 = 0.103), and the PCL-5 (F(1, 205) = 262.460, p < .001, partial η2 = 0.561) with the WP group showing significant positive psychological change following a traumatic event as measured by the PTGI-X and decreased PTSD symptoms as measured by the PCL-5 compared to those in the waitlist condition. Those in the treatment arm also demonstrated gains to psychosocial functioning. Conclusions: Consistent with previous research, participants in the Warrior PATHH program exhibited significant increases in PTG outcomes, decreased PTSD symptoms, and broad improvements to psychosocial functioning. These findings suggest it is an effective training program to foster PTG outcomes among Veterans. This study is unique as it is the first to compare the effects of WP programming with a sample of waitlisted Veterans.