Impact of Treatment Setting and Format on Symptom Severity Following Cognitive Processing Therapy for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
Abstract: Preliminary data suggest cognitive processing therapy (CPT) significantly reduces posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptom severity among military personnel and veterans when delivered over 12 days and combined with daily recreational activities (Bryan et al., 2018). The present study aimed to examine how therapy pace (i.e., daily vs. weekly sessions) and setting (i.e., clinic vs. recreational) impacts change in PTSD symptom severity. Forty-five military personnel and veterans diagnosed with PTSD chose to receive CPT (a) daily at a recreational facility with recreational programming, (b) daily on a university campus without recreational programming, and (c) weekly on a university campus without recreational programming. PTSD symptom severity was assessed with the Clinician Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5) and the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL5). Reductions in CAPS-5 and PCL-5 scores were large and statistically significant across all three settings (Cohen’s ds > 2.1). As compared to reductions in CAPS-5 and PCL-5 scores in daily therapy at a recreational facility (CAPS-5: d = 1.63–2.40; PCL-5: d = 1.99–2.17), reductions in CAPS-5 and PCL-5 scores were significantly larger in daily therapy on campus, CAPS-5: t(80) = –2.9, p = .005, d = 2.23–2.69; PCL-5: t(78) = 2.6, p = .010, d = 2.54–4.43, but not weekly therapy on campus, CAPS-5: t(80) = 0.2, p = .883, d = 1.04–2.47; PCL-5: t(78) = 1.0, p = .310, d = 1.77–3.44. Participants receiving daily therapy on campus and weekly therapy on campus also had higher rates of clinically significant improvement and good endstate functioning. Results support the effectiveness of CPT across multiple treatment settings and formats and suggest that daily CPT may be less effective when delivered in combination with recreational activities.
Abstract: Introduction: Persistent inequities exist in obstetric and neonatal outcomes in military families despite universal health care coverage. Though the exact underlying cause has not been identified, social determinants of health may uniquely impact military families. The purpose of this study was to qualitatively investigate the potential impact of social determinants of health and the lived experiences of military individuals seeking maternity care in the Military Health System. Materials and methods: This was an Institutional Review Board-approved protocol. Nine providers conducted 31 semi-structured interviews with individuals who delivered within the last 5 years in the direct or purchased care market. Participants were recruited through social media blasts and clinic flyers with both maximum variation and homogenous sampling to ensure participation of diverse individuals. Data were coded and themes were identified using inductive qualitative research methods. Results: Three main themes were identified: Requirements of Military Life (with subthemes of pregnancy notification and privacy during care, role of pregnancy instructions and policies, and role of command support), Sociocultural Aspects of the Military Experience (with subthemes of pregnancy as a burden on colleagues and a career detractor, postpartum adjustment, balancing personal and professional requirements, pregnancy timing and parenting challenges, and importance of friendship and camaraderie in pregnancy), and Navigating the Healthcare Experience (including subthemes of transfer between military and civilian care and TRICARE challenges, perception of military care as inferior to civilian, and remote duty stations and international care). Conclusions: The unique stressors of military life act synergistically with the existing health care challenges, presenting opportunities for improvements in care. Such opportunities may include increased consistency of policies across services and commands. Increased access to group prenatal care and support groups, and increased assistance with navigating the health care system to improve care transitions were frequently requested changes by participants.