Anger mediates the relationship between posttraumatic stress disorder and suicidal ideation in veterans
Abstract: Background: Theoretical models and cross-sectional empirical studies of suicide indicate that anger is a factor that may help explain the association between posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and suicide, but to date no longitudinal studies have examined this relationship. The current study used longitudinal data to examine whether changes in anger mediated the association between changes in PTSD symptomatology and suicidal ideation (SI). Methods: Post 9/11-era veterans (N = 298) were assessed at baseline, 6-months, and 12-month time points on PTSD symptoms, anger, and SI. Analyses covaried for age, sex, and depressive symptoms. Multilevel structural equation modeling was used to examine the three waves of data. Results: The effect of change in PTSD symptoms on SI was reduced from B = 0.02 (p = .008) to B = −0.01 (p = .67) when change in anger was added to the model. Moreover, the indirect effect of changes in PTSD symptoms on suicidal ideation via changes in anger was significant, B = 0.02, p = .034. The model explained 31.1% of the within-person variance in SI. Limitations: Focus on predicting SI rather than suicidal behavior. Sample was primarily male. Conclusions: Findings suggest that the association between PTSD and SI is accounted for, in part, by anger. This study further highlights the importance of anger as a risk factor for veteran suicide. Additional research on clinical interventions to reduce anger among veterans with PTSD may be useful in reducing suicide risk.
Abstract: Introduction: Persistent inequities exist in obstetric and neonatal outcomes in military families despite universal health care coverage. Though the exact underlying cause has not been identified, social determinants of health may uniquely impact military families. The purpose of this study was to qualitatively investigate the potential impact of social determinants of health and the lived experiences of military individuals seeking maternity care in the Military Health System. Materials and methods: This was an Institutional Review Board-approved protocol. Nine providers conducted 31 semi-structured interviews with individuals who delivered within the last 5 years in the direct or purchased care market. Participants were recruited through social media blasts and clinic flyers with both maximum variation and homogenous sampling to ensure participation of diverse individuals. Data were coded and themes were identified using inductive qualitative research methods. Results: Three main themes were identified: Requirements of Military Life (with subthemes of pregnancy notification and privacy during care, role of pregnancy instructions and policies, and role of command support), Sociocultural Aspects of the Military Experience (with subthemes of pregnancy as a burden on colleagues and a career detractor, postpartum adjustment, balancing personal and professional requirements, pregnancy timing and parenting challenges, and importance of friendship and camaraderie in pregnancy), and Navigating the Healthcare Experience (including subthemes of transfer between military and civilian care and TRICARE challenges, perception of military care as inferior to civilian, and remote duty stations and international care). Conclusions: The unique stressors of military life act synergistically with the existing health care challenges, presenting opportunities for improvements in care. Such opportunities may include increased consistency of policies across services and commands. Increased access to group prenatal care and support groups, and increased assistance with navigating the health care system to improve care transitions were frequently requested changes by participants.