Comparing heart rate variability in Canadian Armed Forces patients to control participants without chronic pain/mental health issues

Abstract: Background The autonomic nervous system is subserved by the sympathetic and parasympathetic which regulate vital involuntary physiological functions like heart rate. Parasympathetic activity can be measured from the high-frequency component of heart rate variability (HRV), measured via the amplitude of RSA, as a possible predictor for mental health and chronic pain disorders. Therefore, investigators looked to correlate HRV with chronic pain when compared healthy controls. Methods As part of a larger ongoing study, patients complete pre-defined questionnaires on their pain condition, potential risk factors, and function. For patients and controls investigators collected performance and cardiac measures (RSA, LF-HRV, heart period) while at rest, walking and lifting tests. This analysis focused on differences in heart rate variability measures between 100 patients and 48 controls. Results Preliminary analysis revealed demographic and anthropometric variables varied significantly between groups. When comparing HRV measures, respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) during lying and sitting were significantly decreased in patients compared to controls while heart period lying and walking were significantly increased in patients. Correlation analysis revealed significant positive correlation between RSA during lying and sitting when looking at age, gender, and weight. Heart periods during lying and walking were negatively correlated with gender and weight. Discussion To our knowledge it is the first study to look at chronic pain and HRV in the Canadian Forces, while also collecting data on patient reported outcomes, and during various resting and activities. Many potential limitations exist for this study including challenges with respect to controlling for known confounders of heart variability. Conclusion By establishing heart rate variability as a correlate of chronic pain, the outcome of this project could potentially improve quality of care for patients with these conditions. Further work controlling for confounders and relating HRV to pain severity, subtypes, patient reported outcomes and functional abilities will be required to determine the exact value for clinical decision making.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Qualitative analysis of the lived experience of reproductive and pediatric health care in the military health care system

    Abstract: Introduction: Persistent inequities exist in obstetric and neonatal outcomes in military families despite universal health care coverage. Though the exact underlying cause has not been identified, social determinants of health may uniquely impact military families. The purpose of this study was to qualitatively investigate the potential impact of social determinants of health and the lived experiences of military individuals seeking maternity care in the Military Health System. Materials and methods: This was an Institutional Review Board-approved protocol. Nine providers conducted 31 semi-structured interviews with individuals who delivered within the last 5 years in the direct or purchased care market. Participants were recruited through social media blasts and clinic flyers with both maximum variation and homogenous sampling to ensure participation of diverse individuals. Data were coded and themes were identified using inductive qualitative research methods. Results: Three main themes were identified: Requirements of Military Life (with subthemes of pregnancy notification and privacy during care, role of pregnancy instructions and policies, and role of command support), Sociocultural Aspects of the Military Experience (with subthemes of pregnancy as a burden on colleagues and a career detractor, postpartum adjustment, balancing personal and professional requirements, pregnancy timing and parenting challenges, and importance of friendship and camaraderie in pregnancy), and Navigating the Healthcare Experience (including subthemes of transfer between military and civilian care and TRICARE challenges, perception of military care as inferior to civilian, and remote duty stations and international care). Conclusions: The unique stressors of military life act synergistically with the existing health care challenges, presenting opportunities for improvements in care. Such opportunities may include increased consistency of policies across services and commands. Increased access to group prenatal care and support groups, and increased assistance with navigating the health care system to improve care transitions were frequently requested changes by participants.