Rural-urban disparities in video telehealth use during rapid mental health care virtualization among American Indian/Alaska Native veterans

Abstract: Importance: American Indian/Alaska Native veterans experience a high risk for health inequities, including mental health (MH) care access. Rapid virtualization of MH care in response to the COVID-19 pandemic facilitated care continuity across the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), but the association between virtualization of care and health inequities among American Indian/Alaska Native veterans is unknown. Objective: To examine differences in video telehealth (VTH) use for MH care between American Indian/Alaska Native and non-American Indian/Alaska Native veterans by rurality and urbanicity. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cohort study, VHA administrative data on VTH use among a veteran cohort that received MH care from October 1, 2019, to February 29, 2020 (prepandemic), and April 1 to December 31, 2020 (early pandemic), were examined. Exposures: At least 1 outpatient MH encounter during the study period. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was use of VTH among all study groups (ie, American Indian/Alaska Native, non-American Indian/Alaska Native, rural, or urban) before and during the early pandemic. American Indian/Alaska Native veteran status and rurality were examined as factors associated with VTH utilization through mixed models. Results: Of 1754311 veterans (mean [SD] age, 54.89 [16.23] years; 85.21% male), 0.48% were rural American Indian/Alaska Native; 29.04%, rural non-American Indian/Alaska Native; 0.77%, urban American Indian/Alaska Native; and 69.71%, urban non-American Indian/Alaska Native. Before the pandemic, a lower percentage of urban (b = -0.91; SE, 0.02; 95% CI, -0.95 to -0.87; P <.001) and non-American Indian/Alaska Native (b = -0.29; SE, 0.09; 95% CI, -0.47 to -0.11; P <.001) veterans used VTH. During the early pandemic period, a greater percentage of urban (b = 1.37; SE, 0.05; 95% CI, 1.27-1.47; P <.001) and non-American Indian/Alaska Native (b = 0.55; SE, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.18-0.92; P =.003) veterans used VTH. There was a significant interaction between rurality and American Indian/Alaska Native status during the early pandemic (b = -1.49; SE, 0.39; 95% CI, -2.25 to -0.73; P <.001). Urban veterans used VTH more than rural veterans, especially American Indian/Alaska Native veterans (non-American Indian/Alaska Native: rurality b = 1.35 [SE, 0.05; 95% CI, 1.25-1.45; P <.001]; American Indian/Alaska Native: rurality b = 2.91 [SE, 0.38; 95% CI, 2.17-3.65; P <.001]). The mean (SE) increase in VTH was 20.34 (0.38) and 15.35 (0.49) percentage points for American Indian/Alaska Native urban and rural veterans, respectively (difference in differences [DID], 4.99 percentage points; SE, 0.62; 95% CI, 3.77-6.21; t = -7.999; df, 11000; P <.001), and 12.97 (0.24) and 11.31 (0.44) percentage points for non-American Indian/Alaska Native urban and rural veterans, respectively (DID, 1.66; SE, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.68-2.64; t = -3.32; df, 15000; P <.001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, although rapid virtualization of MH care was associated with greater VTH use in all veteran groups studied, a significant difference in VTH use was seen between rural and urban populations, especially among American Indian/Alaska Native veterans. The Findings suggest that American Indian/Alaska Native veterans in rural areas may be at risk for VTH access disparities.. © 2023 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Qualitative analysis of the lived experience of reproductive and pediatric health care in the military health care system

    Abstract: Introduction: Persistent inequities exist in obstetric and neonatal outcomes in military families despite universal health care coverage. Though the exact underlying cause has not been identified, social determinants of health may uniquely impact military families. The purpose of this study was to qualitatively investigate the potential impact of social determinants of health and the lived experiences of military individuals seeking maternity care in the Military Health System. Materials and methods: This was an Institutional Review Board-approved protocol. Nine providers conducted 31 semi-structured interviews with individuals who delivered within the last 5 years in the direct or purchased care market. Participants were recruited through social media blasts and clinic flyers with both maximum variation and homogenous sampling to ensure participation of diverse individuals. Data were coded and themes were identified using inductive qualitative research methods. Results: Three main themes were identified: Requirements of Military Life (with subthemes of pregnancy notification and privacy during care, role of pregnancy instructions and policies, and role of command support), Sociocultural Aspects of the Military Experience (with subthemes of pregnancy as a burden on colleagues and a career detractor, postpartum adjustment, balancing personal and professional requirements, pregnancy timing and parenting challenges, and importance of friendship and camaraderie in pregnancy), and Navigating the Healthcare Experience (including subthemes of transfer between military and civilian care and TRICARE challenges, perception of military care as inferior to civilian, and remote duty stations and international care). Conclusions: The unique stressors of military life act synergistically with the existing health care challenges, presenting opportunities for improvements in care. Such opportunities may include increased consistency of policies across services and commands. Increased access to group prenatal care and support groups, and increased assistance with navigating the health care system to improve care transitions were frequently requested changes by participants.

    Physical Health Peer reviewed