Narratives of chronic pain from armed forces veterans
This PhD thesis explores the experiences of 14 veterans of the UK Armed Forces who live with chronic pain. While there is a wealth of data exploring chronic pain in Armed Forces veterans, the existing literature overwhelmingly views chronic pain through a quantitative lens which does not explore the depth of chronic pain lived experience as a result of this; therefore, it is unclear how veterans live with and manage their chronic pain. Participants' stories of living with chronic pain were collected and analysed using dialogical narrative analysis and the analytical lens of autobiographical time, to detail veterans’ autobiographical stories of living with chronic pain, and how they use these stories to make sense of their pain experience in the context of their identity as a veteran. The analysis identifies that the participants understood and made sense of their chronic pain experience through three distinct storytelling phases. The first of these were stories of the military body, and this situated a career that was marked by physicality and the churn of life within the military institution. The second phase of storytelling was about the stigmatised body. These stories situate the attitudes toward pain and weakness within the military and the consequences of showing that the military body is infallible, which in turn inform stoic attitudes toward pain and personal pain management. The final phases of storytelling were told about the moving body, stories about the moving body were about making sense of a new body with pain, how some movement is avoided, and the consequences of this on identity. And how movement is used to understand, learn, and respond to and from their bodies on any given day. This is the first in-depth qualitative study that explores the lived experiences of veterans with chronic pain. It found that stories about chronic pain were told in the context of military experience and how the culture of the military shapes attitudes toward chronic pain, while movement was a keyway in which participants live with and manage their chronic pain.
Abstract: Objective: The present study is a retrospective quasi-experimental study to evaluate the effectiveness of the Warrior PATHH (WP) program at improving posttraumatic growth (PTG) outcomes and reducing PTSD symptoms compared to a waitlist control among a sample of Veterans. Method: Participants (n = 164) were U.S. military Veterans with a history of trauma. Participants were either undergoing the Warrior PATHH program or a waitlist. Primary outcome measures were administered at baseline and at 90-day follow-up and consisted of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory – Expanded (PTGI-X) and the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). Secondary outcome measures assessed psychosocial functioning and included measures of depression and anxiety symptoms, sleep, wellbeing, and social support. Results: Significant differences were observed between groups on the PTGI-X (F(1, 205) = 23.667, p < .001, partial η2 = 0.103), and the PCL-5 (F(1, 205) = 262.460, p < .001, partial η2 = 0.561) with the WP group showing significant positive psychological change following a traumatic event as measured by the PTGI-X and decreased PTSD symptoms as measured by the PCL-5 compared to those in the waitlist condition. Those in the treatment arm also demonstrated gains to psychosocial functioning. Conclusions: Consistent with previous research, participants in the Warrior PATHH program exhibited significant increases in PTG outcomes, decreased PTSD symptoms, and broad improvements to psychosocial functioning. These findings suggest it is an effective training program to foster PTG outcomes among Veterans. This study is unique as it is the first to compare the effects of WP programming with a sample of waitlisted Veterans.