Eating disorder risk and common mental disorders in British servicewomen: A cross-sectional observational study

Abstract: PurposeServicewomen are at increased risk of common mental disorders compared with servicemen and their female civilian counterparts. The prevalence of eating disorder risk and common mental disorders, and associated risk factors in British servicewomen are poorly understood.MethodsAll women younger than 45 yr in the UK Armed Forces were invited to complete a survey about demographics, exercise behaviors, eating behaviors, and common mental disorders.ResultsA total of 3022 women participated; 13% of participants were at high risk of an eating disorder based on Brief Eating Disorder in Athletes Questionnaire and Female Athlete Screening Tool scores. Twenty-five percent of participants had symptoms of anxiety (seven-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Assessment score >= 10), and 26% had symptoms of depression (nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire score >= 10). Older age was associated with a lower risk, and heavier body mass was associated with a higher risk, of eating disorders (P <= 0.043). Older age and higher rank were associated with a lower risk of symptoms of anxiety and depression (P <= 0.031), and a heavier body mass was associated with a higher risk of symptoms of depression (P <= 0.012). Longer habitual sleep duration was associated with a lower risk of eating disorders and symptoms of anxiety and depression (P <= 0.028). A higher volume of field exercise was associated with a lower risk, and a higher volume of military physical training and personal physical training was associated with a higher risk, of eating disorders (P <= 0.024). Job role and deployment history were not associated with any outcome.ConclusionsSleeping and training habits provide potential novel targets for exploring how common mental disorders can be managed in British servicewomen.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    The impact of exposure to morally injurious events on posttraumatic stress symptoms among Israeli combat Veterans: a longitudinal moderated mediation model of moral injury outcomes and dispositional forgiveness

    Abstract: Background: Exposure to potentially morally injurious events (PMIEs) during military service can lead to moral injury (MI) outcomes and posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS). This longitudinal study examined the relationships between PMIE exposure, MI outcomes, and PTSS among Israeli combat veterans, and the potential protective role of dispositional forgiveness in these associations. Method: Participants were 169 Israeli combat veterans who participated in a six-year longitudinal study with four measurement points (T1: 12 months before enlistment, T2: Six months following enlistment- pre-deployment, T3: 18 months following enlistment- post-deployment, and T4: 28 months following discharge). Participants’ characteristics were assessed via semi-structured interviews (T1) and validated self-report measures (T2-T4) between 2019-2024. Results: Approximately 36% of participants reported exposure to PMIEs during service, with 13% exceeding the clinical threshold for probable PTSD at T4. PMIE-Betrayal at T3 was positively associated with MI outcomes of shame and trust violation at T4. The indirect effect of PMIEs on PTSS through MI outcome-Shame depended on forgiveness levels. Among veterans with low forgiveness, higher exposure to PMIE-Betrayal was associated with increased MI shame, which was linked to more severe PTSS. Conversely, for those with high forgiveness, exposure to PMIE-Self and Other was associated with decreased MI shame and subsequently reduced PTSS. Conclusion: Dispositional forgiveness moderates the relationship between PMIE exposure and MI outcomes, particularly shame, which mediates the development of PTSS. These findings highlight forgiveness as a potential target for intervention in treating moral injury and preventing PTSS among combat veterans.