Posttraumatic stress disorder symptom severity and its relationship to performance on the test of memory malingering in a veteran sample

Abstract: Objective: To examine relationships between Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) symptom severity and performance on the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) trials in veterans without a diagnosis of neurocognitive disorder. Method: A sample of 47 clinically-referred veterans (80.9% male; Mage = 57.47, SD = 14.83; Medu = 13.91, SD = 2.5) who did not meet criteria for a neurocognitive disorder completed the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) and the TOMM. Primary diagnoses included PTSD (48.9%), no diagnosis (23.4%), and depression (19.1%). A cutoff of 45 was used for each trial; 47 completed Trial 1 (TOMM-T1), 17 completed Trial 2 (TOMM-T2), and 10 completed Retention Trial (TOMM-Ret). Nine participants (19.1%) failed the TOMM. Analyses included Pearson correlation, Spearman correlation, and independent-samples t-tests. Age was negatively correlated with PCL-5 and positively correlated with TOMM-T1; therefore, relevant partial correlations were conducted. Results: TOMM-T1 demonstrated a moderate, negative correlation with PCL-5, rs(45) = −0.469, p < 0.001, 95%CI(−0.688,-0.248). A moderate non-significant correlation was found between TOMM-T2 and PCL-5, rs(15) = −0.405, p = 0.053, 95%CI(−0.775,0.014). PCL-5 and TOMM-Ret were not correlated. Controlling for age, the correlation between PCL-5 and TOMM-T1 remained significant (rs[44] = −0.426, p = 0.002). Those who passed TOMM (M = 38.45, SD = 16.48) had significantly lower PCL-5 scores compared to those who failed (M = 57.67, SD = 13.83), t(45) = −3.231, p = 0.001, Cohen’s D = 16.04. Conclusions: Among veterans, PTSD symptom severity was related to TOMM scores and/or failure. Findings highlight a need to consider the role PTSD symptoms may play in neuropsychological assessment. Findings further support recommendations for trauma-focused treatment before formal neuropsychological testing, as psychiatric symptoms may interfere with obtaining a valid assessment of cognition.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Qualitative analysis of the lived experience of reproductive and pediatric health care in the military health care system

    Abstract: Introduction: Persistent inequities exist in obstetric and neonatal outcomes in military families despite universal health care coverage. Though the exact underlying cause has not been identified, social determinants of health may uniquely impact military families. The purpose of this study was to qualitatively investigate the potential impact of social determinants of health and the lived experiences of military individuals seeking maternity care in the Military Health System. Materials and methods: This was an Institutional Review Board-approved protocol. Nine providers conducted 31 semi-structured interviews with individuals who delivered within the last 5 years in the direct or purchased care market. Participants were recruited through social media blasts and clinic flyers with both maximum variation and homogenous sampling to ensure participation of diverse individuals. Data were coded and themes were identified using inductive qualitative research methods. Results: Three main themes were identified: Requirements of Military Life (with subthemes of pregnancy notification and privacy during care, role of pregnancy instructions and policies, and role of command support), Sociocultural Aspects of the Military Experience (with subthemes of pregnancy as a burden on colleagues and a career detractor, postpartum adjustment, balancing personal and professional requirements, pregnancy timing and parenting challenges, and importance of friendship and camaraderie in pregnancy), and Navigating the Healthcare Experience (including subthemes of transfer between military and civilian care and TRICARE challenges, perception of military care as inferior to civilian, and remote duty stations and international care). Conclusions: The unique stressors of military life act synergistically with the existing health care challenges, presenting opportunities for improvements in care. Such opportunities may include increased consistency of policies across services and commands. Increased access to group prenatal care and support groups, and increased assistance with navigating the health care system to improve care transitions were frequently requested changes by participants.

    Physical Health Peer reviewed