Understanding military spouses’ permanent change of station move experiences

Abstract: Military OneSource (2021) defines a permanent change of station (PCS) move as a U.S. service member (SM) being assigned to a new work or duty location. Despite the name, PCS moves are not permanent. The duration for most SMs, from all US military branches, PCS moves were between two to four years. However, about 33% of all U.S. SMs experience a yearly PCS move (Tong et al., 2018). This shows the prevalence of PCS moves in all SMs’ careers which can lead to many potential family life disruptions especially to their military spouses. Unfortunately, literature on PCS moves impact to military spouses or spouses married to SMs from different US branches, remains sparse in a qualitative analysis study. This study, through conventional content analysis, provided an in-depth qualitative examination of military spouses’ coping experiences with PCS moves. This study identified three common themes from all 12 participants’ PCS move experiences. These themes are PCS move negative impacts on self and family like postpartum depression, anxiety, stress on family raising, and constant uncertainty, adapting to military culture support role in culture of SM and their career first, and different coping styles with PCS moves like social isolation, build up support system, utilizing formal and informal resources. This study’s overall findings are consistent with the available literature’s conclusions about the negative impacts of PCS moves on military spouses. These impacts include overall lower well-being, lower satisfaction and difficult adjustment to military and surrounding base culture, health issues, career struggles, social isolation, family lifestyle, childraising issues, and receiving medical care services (Lutz, 2014; Runge et al., 2014; Tong et al., 2018; Office of People Analytics, 2020; Keilholz, 2020; Gleason and Beck, 2017; Mailey et al., 2018; Curran et al., 2018). Like other similar studies, half of this dissertation’s participants also reported the benefits for themselves and their families. These benefits include building resilience, having an open mindset to challenges, meeting people from diverse cultures, and traveling around the world (Borah & Fina, 2017; Huffman et al., 2019).

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Qualitative analysis of the lived experience of reproductive and pediatric health care in the military health care system

    Abstract: Introduction: Persistent inequities exist in obstetric and neonatal outcomes in military families despite universal health care coverage. Though the exact underlying cause has not been identified, social determinants of health may uniquely impact military families. The purpose of this study was to qualitatively investigate the potential impact of social determinants of health and the lived experiences of military individuals seeking maternity care in the Military Health System. Materials and methods: This was an Institutional Review Board-approved protocol. Nine providers conducted 31 semi-structured interviews with individuals who delivered within the last 5 years in the direct or purchased care market. Participants were recruited through social media blasts and clinic flyers with both maximum variation and homogenous sampling to ensure participation of diverse individuals. Data were coded and themes were identified using inductive qualitative research methods. Results: Three main themes were identified: Requirements of Military Life (with subthemes of pregnancy notification and privacy during care, role of pregnancy instructions and policies, and role of command support), Sociocultural Aspects of the Military Experience (with subthemes of pregnancy as a burden on colleagues and a career detractor, postpartum adjustment, balancing personal and professional requirements, pregnancy timing and parenting challenges, and importance of friendship and camaraderie in pregnancy), and Navigating the Healthcare Experience (including subthemes of transfer between military and civilian care and TRICARE challenges, perception of military care as inferior to civilian, and remote duty stations and international care). Conclusions: The unique stressors of military life act synergistically with the existing health care challenges, presenting opportunities for improvements in care. Such opportunities may include increased consistency of policies across services and commands. Increased access to group prenatal care and support groups, and increased assistance with navigating the health care system to improve care transitions were frequently requested changes by participants.