The role of deployment history on the association between epilepsy and traumatic brain injury in post-9/11 era U.S. Veterans

Abstract: BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a well-established epilepsy risk factor and is common among service members. Deployment related TBI, where combat/blast may be more common, may have different outcomes than non-deployment related TBI. This work examined associations of all TBI exposures (not just combat), and epilepsy, while adjusting for comorbidities associated with epilepsy, among Veterans by deployment status. METHODS: The cohort included post-9/11 Veterans with ≥ 2 years of care in both Veterans Health Administration (VHA) and Defense Health Agency (DHA) systems. We identified epilepsy using ICD-9/10-CM codes, anti-seizure medication, and service-connected disability for epilepsy. We conducted a logistic regression model with interaction terms for conditions by deployment history that adjusted for demographics and military characteristics. RESULTS: The cohort (n=938,890) included post-9/11 Veterans of which 27,436 (2.92%) had epilepsy. Most Veterans had a history of deployment (70.64%), referred to as "deployed". Epilepsy was more common among Veterans who were never deployed ("non-deployed") (3.85% vs. 2.54%). Deployed Veterans were more likely to have had TBI, compared to the non-deployed (33.94% vs. 4.24%), but non-deployed Veterans with moderate/severe TBI had higher odds of epilepsy compared to deployed Veterans (aOR=2.92, 95% CI: 2.68-3.17 vs. aOR=2.01, 95% CI: 1.91-2.11). Penetrating TBI had higher odds of epilepsy among the deployed (aOR=5.33, 95% CI: 4.89-5.81), whereas the odds of epilepsy for mild TBI did not significantly differ by deployment status. Though most neurological conditions were more prevalent among non-deployed, they were often associated with higher odds of epilepsy in the deployed. DISCUSSION: Deployment history had a significant differential impact on epilepsy predictors. As expected, penetrating TBI had a greater epilepsy impact among deployed Veterans perhaps due to combat/blast. Some epilepsy predictors (moderate/severe TBI, MS, Parkinson's disease) had a stronger association in the non-deployed suggesting a potential healthy warrior effect in which such conditions preclude deployment. Other neurological conditions (e.g., brain tumor, Alzheimer's disease/frontotemporal dementia) had a greater epilepsy impact in the deployed. This may be attributable to deployment related exposures (combat injury, occupational exposures). A better understanding of deployment effects is critical to provide targeted epilepsy prevention in Veterans and military service members.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Qualitative analysis of the lived experience of reproductive and pediatric health care in the military health care system

    Abstract: Introduction: Persistent inequities exist in obstetric and neonatal outcomes in military families despite universal health care coverage. Though the exact underlying cause has not been identified, social determinants of health may uniquely impact military families. The purpose of this study was to qualitatively investigate the potential impact of social determinants of health and the lived experiences of military individuals seeking maternity care in the Military Health System. Materials and methods: This was an Institutional Review Board-approved protocol. Nine providers conducted 31 semi-structured interviews with individuals who delivered within the last 5 years in the direct or purchased care market. Participants were recruited through social media blasts and clinic flyers with both maximum variation and homogenous sampling to ensure participation of diverse individuals. Data were coded and themes were identified using inductive qualitative research methods. Results: Three main themes were identified: Requirements of Military Life (with subthemes of pregnancy notification and privacy during care, role of pregnancy instructions and policies, and role of command support), Sociocultural Aspects of the Military Experience (with subthemes of pregnancy as a burden on colleagues and a career detractor, postpartum adjustment, balancing personal and professional requirements, pregnancy timing and parenting challenges, and importance of friendship and camaraderie in pregnancy), and Navigating the Healthcare Experience (including subthemes of transfer between military and civilian care and TRICARE challenges, perception of military care as inferior to civilian, and remote duty stations and international care). Conclusions: The unique stressors of military life act synergistically with the existing health care challenges, presenting opportunities for improvements in care. Such opportunities may include increased consistency of policies across services and commands. Increased access to group prenatal care and support groups, and increased assistance with navigating the health care system to improve care transitions were frequently requested changes by participants.