I don’t feel like that’s for me: Overcoming barriers to mental healthcare for women veterans

Abstract: Approximately 13.6%, or approximately 250,000 of the 1.85 million veterans in England and Wales are female with numbers expected to increase alongside the number of women recruited to the UK Armed Forces. Despite this, veteran research focused on mental health support needs and help-seeking experiences continues to be predominantly focused on men.

Furthermore, whilst research highlights that UK women veterans are more likely to seek formal mental health support than their male peers evidence suggests that women are underutilising specialist veterans’ services. Emerging UK research highlights that women veterans experience gender-related barriers when accessing support, including: a lack of recognition of their veteran status, misconceptions regarding women’s roles in the Armed Forces, the impact of military cultural narratives of female weakness on help-seeking, gender discrimination by professionals, caring responsibilities, previous poor experiences of support, and gender bias in service design. Additionally, US research supports these findings and highlights discomfort or feeling unwelcome in male-dominated veteran treatment environments.

To provide a better understanding of these issues, this project set out to explore the mental healthcare support needs and experiences of women veterans in England, and to develop practical guidance for mental healthcare professionals working with women veterans, codesigned with women veterans. This report summarises the key findings of this research project, and links to practical guidance for mental healthcare professionals working with women veterans.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Policy & Practice

    The ask, care, escort suite of trainings: Initial evaluation of the Army’s primary suicide prevention strategy

    Abstract: The U.S. Army’s Ask, Care, Escort (ACE) suicide gatekeeper training has been the annual requirement for all personnel since 2009; however, this training has never been formally evaluated. The present study evaluated three updated versions of ACE: a training for Army leaders (ACE-Suicide Intervention), a training for basic combat trainees (ACE for Basic Combat Training and One Station Unit Training), and a standard training for all personnel (ACE for the Force). Self-report surveys measured pre- to posttraining changes in objective and subjective knowledge and stigma, as well as preparedness, self-efficacy, and likelihood to engage in gatekeeper behaviors. Implementation outcomes, such as training acceptability, suitability, and usability were also assessed. Across these evaluations, participants reported that knowledge and gatekeeper behaviors significantly improved from pre- to posttraining. Implementation metrics revealed a high degree of acceptability and relevance for all three ACE trainings. Overall, the findings of these evaluations suggest important changes in key suicide prevention outcomes following the ACE suite of trainings. Further longitudinal assessment is needed to establish the full effectiveness of gatekeeper interventions in the Army.