National comparison of Veterans and non-veterans medical center patient satisfaction ratings: An HCAHPS survey data analysis

Abstract: This study compared patient satisfaction with quality of care received in US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals and non-VA hospitals. Out of the 137 VA hospitals in operation, 113 reported Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey results, which were used in this analysis. Each VA hospital was matched with a non-VA hospital within the same city that had the most similar bed count. Hospitals were compared using eight of the 29 total questions on the HCAHPS patient satisfaction survey, covering areas of care delivery including: doctor and nurse communication, staff responsiveness, cleanliness, preference consideration, care transition, overall rating, and likelihood of recommendation. For all eight questions, VA hospitals received significantly more positive responses, and non-VA hospitals received significantly more moderate and negative responses. This showed that patients were more satisfied with care in VA hospitals than non-VA hospitals. A secondary analysis aimed to determine whether there were differences in VA patient satisfaction between different regions of the US. The 113 VA hospitals were grouped into 4 regions (Northeast, Midwest, South, and West) and patient satisfaction was compared using the same eight HCAHPS questions as the primary analysis. Overall, results did not yield extensive differences between these regions; however, there was a trend of the South having more negative responses than the Midwest. Results suggest that recent calls for higher-quality VA care and increases in VA funding have led to greater patient satisfaction for our nation’s veterans.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Qualitative analysis of the lived experience of reproductive and pediatric health care in the military health care system

    Abstract: Introduction: Persistent inequities exist in obstetric and neonatal outcomes in military families despite universal health care coverage. Though the exact underlying cause has not been identified, social determinants of health may uniquely impact military families. The purpose of this study was to qualitatively investigate the potential impact of social determinants of health and the lived experiences of military individuals seeking maternity care in the Military Health System. Materials and methods: This was an Institutional Review Board-approved protocol. Nine providers conducted 31 semi-structured interviews with individuals who delivered within the last 5 years in the direct or purchased care market. Participants were recruited through social media blasts and clinic flyers with both maximum variation and homogenous sampling to ensure participation of diverse individuals. Data were coded and themes were identified using inductive qualitative research methods. Results: Three main themes were identified: Requirements of Military Life (with subthemes of pregnancy notification and privacy during care, role of pregnancy instructions and policies, and role of command support), Sociocultural Aspects of the Military Experience (with subthemes of pregnancy as a burden on colleagues and a career detractor, postpartum adjustment, balancing personal and professional requirements, pregnancy timing and parenting challenges, and importance of friendship and camaraderie in pregnancy), and Navigating the Healthcare Experience (including subthemes of transfer between military and civilian care and TRICARE challenges, perception of military care as inferior to civilian, and remote duty stations and international care). Conclusions: The unique stressors of military life act synergistically with the existing health care challenges, presenting opportunities for improvements in care. Such opportunities may include increased consistency of policies across services and commands. Increased access to group prenatal care and support groups, and increased assistance with navigating the health care system to improve care transitions were frequently requested changes by participants.