Military adverse childhood experiences: Ex-servicemen’s experience of military discharge and its impact on their sense of identity

Abstract: How service people make sense of their identity is suggested to be one of the key determinants to a successful military discharge (Ahern et al., 2015; Binks & Cambridge, 2018; Herman & Yarwood, 2014). Service people may be more vulnerable to transitionary junctures as they are significantly more likely to have experienced adverse childhoods than the general population (Blosnich et al., 2014; McCauley et al., 2015), something which is suggested to detrimentally impact transition success (Forster et al., 2020) as well as lead to identity salience difficulties (Carroll et al., 2017; Katon et al., 2015; Wong et al., 2019). We explored individuals’ sense of self during and after discharge by conducting semistructured telephone interviews with 10 U.K. ex-servicemen from significantly adverse childhood backgrounds (four or more adverse childhood experiences), using interpretative phenomenological analysis and a social identity theory (SIT) lens. Four superordinate themes were developed: abandoned in discharge, reborn into a foreign land, you never leave the forces, and us and them. Our findings highlight the role of identity in discharge, in particular the difficulties/importance in reconceptualizing self during this process. — Our study reinforces the importance of treating all ex-military service people as individuals in their own right, rather than relying on assumptions and generalizations. Although military discharge can significantly impact an individual’s identity, bringing up powerful feelings of abandonment for those from significantly adverse childhoods, each individual experiences this differently. Providing support on a practical, emotional, and psychological level before, during, and after discharge may aid ex-service people in navigating this potential traumatic and life-changing time.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Outcomes from a posttraumatic growth-oriented program among Veterans: A quasi-experimental retrospective study

    Abstract: Objective: The present study is a retrospective quasi-experimental study to evaluate the effectiveness of the Warrior PATHH (WP) program at improving posttraumatic growth (PTG) outcomes and reducing PTSD symptoms compared to a waitlist control among a sample of Veterans. Method: Participants (n = 164) were U.S. military Veterans with a history of trauma. Participants were either undergoing the Warrior PATHH program or a waitlist. Primary outcome measures were administered at baseline and at 90-day follow-up and consisted of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory – Expanded (PTGI-X) and the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). Secondary outcome measures assessed psychosocial functioning and included measures of depression and anxiety symptoms, sleep, wellbeing, and social support. Results: Significant differences were observed between groups on the PTGI-X (F(1, 205) = 23.667, p < .001, partial η2 = 0.103), and the PCL-5 (F(1, 205) = 262.460, p < .001, partial η2 = 0.561) with the WP group showing significant positive psychological change following a traumatic event as measured by the PTGI-X and decreased PTSD symptoms as measured by the PCL-5 compared to those in the waitlist condition. Those in the treatment arm also demonstrated gains to psychosocial functioning. Conclusions: Consistent with previous research, participants in the Warrior PATHH program exhibited significant increases in PTG outcomes, decreased PTSD symptoms, and broad improvements to psychosocial functioning. These findings suggest it is an effective training program to foster PTG outcomes among Veterans. This study is unique as it is the first to compare the effects of WP programming with a sample of waitlisted Veterans.