No man left behind', Conceptualizing functioning and increasing access to care for male survivors of military sexual trauma

Abstract: Military sexual trauma (MST), or the perpetration of sexual harassment or sexual assault against a member of the military, continues to be a pervasive problem which affects many service members’ mental health (Fillo et al., 2018; SAPRO, 2021; Tannahill, 2020). Research on psychological sequelae and healthcare utilization among this population is limited and has primarily focused on female MST survivors (Monteith et al., 2019; Morris et al., 2014). Paper 1 presents an empirical analysis of sex differences in psychological functioning and patterns of healthcare utilization among survivors of MST. To reduce the influence of confounding variables sixty-one male survivors of MST were 1:1 propensity matched to female MST survivors on duty status, race, age, experiences of military sexual harassment, and experiences of military sexual assault. There were significant differences in PTSD scores and life satisfaction, wherein male MST survivors reported higher PTSD symptomatology and lower life satisfaction than matched female MST survivors. Veteran sex did not significantly predict VA healthcare satisfaction, VA healthcare use, or non-VA (i.e., civilian) healthcare use. Then, 2x2 between subjects factorial analysis of variance (ANOVA) were conducted to examine the influence of gender and mental healthcare access on mental health symptoms reported among MST survivors. There were no significant interaction effects between gender and mental healthcare treatment on mental health outcomes in our sample. However, treatment access was associated with higher PTSD symptoms, lower life satisfaction, and more alcohol use among the sample of MST survivors. Paper 2 presents an integrative literature review focusing on the barriers which prevent male MST survivors from accessing effective healthcare within the Veterans Healthcare Administration (VHA). The VHA is a national institution that operates separately from civilian healthcare, with its own training, mandates, and screening processes (Trivedi et al., 2011). This integrative literature review applies an ecological model of healthcare access (Zinzow et al., 2021) to the VHA. Barriers to accessing healthcare for male MST survivors are outlined at each level of the ecological model. Recommendations for remediating these barriers are provided and include military culture interventions, research initiatives, and policy recommendations for changes to the VA’s organization of MST care.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Qualitative analysis of the lived experience of reproductive and pediatric health care in the military health care system

    Abstract: Introduction: Persistent inequities exist in obstetric and neonatal outcomes in military families despite universal health care coverage. Though the exact underlying cause has not been identified, social determinants of health may uniquely impact military families. The purpose of this study was to qualitatively investigate the potential impact of social determinants of health and the lived experiences of military individuals seeking maternity care in the Military Health System. Materials and methods: This was an Institutional Review Board-approved protocol. Nine providers conducted 31 semi-structured interviews with individuals who delivered within the last 5 years in the direct or purchased care market. Participants were recruited through social media blasts and clinic flyers with both maximum variation and homogenous sampling to ensure participation of diverse individuals. Data were coded and themes were identified using inductive qualitative research methods. Results: Three main themes were identified: Requirements of Military Life (with subthemes of pregnancy notification and privacy during care, role of pregnancy instructions and policies, and role of command support), Sociocultural Aspects of the Military Experience (with subthemes of pregnancy as a burden on colleagues and a career detractor, postpartum adjustment, balancing personal and professional requirements, pregnancy timing and parenting challenges, and importance of friendship and camaraderie in pregnancy), and Navigating the Healthcare Experience (including subthemes of transfer between military and civilian care and TRICARE challenges, perception of military care as inferior to civilian, and remote duty stations and international care). Conclusions: The unique stressors of military life act synergistically with the existing health care challenges, presenting opportunities for improvements in care. Such opportunities may include increased consistency of policies across services and commands. Increased access to group prenatal care and support groups, and increased assistance with navigating the health care system to improve care transitions were frequently requested changes by participants.