Beyond the finish line

Abstract: Forces in Mind Trust’s mission is that all ex-Service persons and their families make a successful and sustainable transition to civilian life, a principle closely aligned to Invictus objectives. The publication of this report also marks the Trust’s enduring support for the Invictus vison. Through several iterations of the Invictus Games, interviews with a multitude of participants and families and addressing the unforeseen consequences and impact of the COVID pandemic, this report is significant as the first longitudinal investigation of the benefits of international adapted sport competition for Service Members and Veterans experiencing physical and/or psychological illnesses and injuries. As such, our hope is that it can be of use to Invictus Games and groups such as Help 4 Heroes, Walking With The Wounded and others offering any sort of sports or activities-based rehabilitation and recreation for wounded, injured and sick veterans, and, perhaps as well, those paralympic organisations where the ultimate competitive challenge might be found. The study’s general findings might seem self-evident: long-term competitive adaptive sports are valuable; sports are a good platform for personal growth; strengthening of the entire community of competitors, non-competitors and entourage in both physical and mental health is important. But the findings go further than this. The default view that ‘para-sports’ or adaptive games are only for the physically injured is comprehensively re-addressed and importantly recognises the complexity of participants conditions including their psychological impact. The short and longerterm dividends for improved personal resilience in all its dimensions are also empirically recorded with useful findings of where best practice can be found. The recognition of families and of those who might not compete is also important and recognising the importance of their resilience in the long road toward rehabilitation is a welcome aspect. The positivity of preparing for competition and competing itself is a genuine ‘team effort’ however broadly one defines that ‘team’. As the Invictus Games Foundation looks forward, reflecting upon the experience of Dusseldorf and looking ahead to Vancouver, this independent report can hopefully be seen as a validation of the founding aim of Invictus, to inspire through the power of the unconquered human spirit. But it also should be seen as a comprehensive and objective evaluation of the benefit of sport, with findings upon which to evolve and continually improve the experience for all concerned.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    The impact of exposure to morally injurious events on posttraumatic stress symptoms among Israeli combat Veterans: a longitudinal moderated mediation model of moral injury outcomes and dispositional forgiveness

    Abstract: Background: Exposure to potentially morally injurious events (PMIEs) during military service can lead to moral injury (MI) outcomes and posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS). This longitudinal study examined the relationships between PMIE exposure, MI outcomes, and PTSS among Israeli combat veterans, and the potential protective role of dispositional forgiveness in these associations. Method: Participants were 169 Israeli combat veterans who participated in a six-year longitudinal study with four measurement points (T1: 12 months before enlistment, T2: Six months following enlistment- pre-deployment, T3: 18 months following enlistment- post-deployment, and T4: 28 months following discharge). Participants’ characteristics were assessed via semi-structured interviews (T1) and validated self-report measures (T2-T4) between 2019-2024. Results: Approximately 36% of participants reported exposure to PMIEs during service, with 13% exceeding the clinical threshold for probable PTSD at T4. PMIE-Betrayal at T3 was positively associated with MI outcomes of shame and trust violation at T4. The indirect effect of PMIEs on PTSS through MI outcome-Shame depended on forgiveness levels. Among veterans with low forgiveness, higher exposure to PMIE-Betrayal was associated with increased MI shame, which was linked to more severe PTSS. Conversely, for those with high forgiveness, exposure to PMIE-Self and Other was associated with decreased MI shame and subsequently reduced PTSS. Conclusion: Dispositional forgiveness moderates the relationship between PMIE exposure and MI outcomes, particularly shame, which mediates the development of PTSS. These findings highlight forgiveness as a potential target for intervention in treating moral injury and preventing PTSS among combat veterans.