Trauma exposure, mental health, and mental health treatment among LGBTQ+ Veterans and nonveterans

Abstract: Objective: The purpose of the study was to compare lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer+ (LGBTQ+) veterans' and nonveterans' prevalence of potentially traumatic events (PTEs) and other stressor exposures, mental health concerns, and mental health treatment. METHOD: A subsample of veterans and nonveterans who identified as LGBTQ+ (N = 1,291; 851 veterans; 440 nonveterans) were identified from a national cohort of post-9/11 veterans and matched nonveterans. Majority of the sample identified as White (59.7%), men (40.4%), and gay or lesbian (48.6%). Measures included PTEs and other stressors, depression, anxiety, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and receipt of mental health treatment. Logistic regressions compared the likelihood of experiencing PTEs and other stressors, self-reported mental health diagnoses, and mental health treatment between LGBTQ+ veterans and nonveterans. Results: Compared with LGBTQ+ nonveterans, LGBTQ+ veterans were more likely to report financial strain, divorce, discrimination, witnessing the sudden death of a friend or family member, and experiencing a serious accident or disaster. LGBTQ+ veterans reported greater depression, anxiety, and PTSD symptom severity than LGBTQ+ nonveterans. However, LGBTQ+ veterans were only more likely to receive psychotherapy for PTSD and did not differ from nonveterans in the likelihood of receiving any other types of mental health treatment. Conclusions: The study was the first to demonstrate that LGBTQ+ veterans have a greater prevalence of PTEs and other stressors and report worse mental health symptoms. These findings suggest that LGBTQ+ veterans may have unmet mental health treatment needs and need interventions to increase engagement in needed mental health services, especially for depression and anxiety.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Qualitative analysis of the lived experience of reproductive and pediatric health care in the military health care system

    Abstract: Introduction: Persistent inequities exist in obstetric and neonatal outcomes in military families despite universal health care coverage. Though the exact underlying cause has not been identified, social determinants of health may uniquely impact military families. The purpose of this study was to qualitatively investigate the potential impact of social determinants of health and the lived experiences of military individuals seeking maternity care in the Military Health System. Materials and methods: This was an Institutional Review Board-approved protocol. Nine providers conducted 31 semi-structured interviews with individuals who delivered within the last 5 years in the direct or purchased care market. Participants were recruited through social media blasts and clinic flyers with both maximum variation and homogenous sampling to ensure participation of diverse individuals. Data were coded and themes were identified using inductive qualitative research methods. Results: Three main themes were identified: Requirements of Military Life (with subthemes of pregnancy notification and privacy during care, role of pregnancy instructions and policies, and role of command support), Sociocultural Aspects of the Military Experience (with subthemes of pregnancy as a burden on colleagues and a career detractor, postpartum adjustment, balancing personal and professional requirements, pregnancy timing and parenting challenges, and importance of friendship and camaraderie in pregnancy), and Navigating the Healthcare Experience (including subthemes of transfer between military and civilian care and TRICARE challenges, perception of military care as inferior to civilian, and remote duty stations and international care). Conclusions: The unique stressors of military life act synergistically with the existing health care challenges, presenting opportunities for improvements in care. Such opportunities may include increased consistency of policies across services and commands. Increased access to group prenatal care and support groups, and increased assistance with navigating the health care system to improve care transitions were frequently requested changes by participants.