Variation in psychosocial symptom change: A preliminary examination of Veterans in early medication treatment for opioid use disorder

Abstract: Aim: Risk for Medication treatment for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD) dropout is greatest during early treatment. To optimize MOUD outcomes, it is critical to identify differential sensitivity of opioid withdrawal symptoms to MOUD. This preliminary study, therefore, assessed daily fluctuations in subjective craving, withdrawal, stress, and pain across the first month of MOUD. We hypothesized opioid craving and withdrawal symptoms would be more sensitive than stress or pain to MOUD. Methods: Male Veterans (N=7; M[SD]Age=50.71[16.09],100% White/Non-Hispanic or Latinx) were recruited between December 2021 and October 2022, at VACHS, within 48 hours of induction onto MOUD (buprenorphine or methadone). Participants self-reported intensity in end-of-day brief smartphone surveys (e.g., “How would you rate your overall pain in the past 24 hours from 0 [not at all] to 10 [extremely]?”). Data was analyzed using multilevel models, with symptom intensity predicted by day in treatment, symptom type, and their interaction. Random intercepts were specified according to participant and random slopes permitted across treatment days. Results: Random effects ANOVA’s indicated an ICC of 0.48. Significant effects were identified for symptom type (F[3,567.87]=10.76, p<.001) and the day*symptom type interaction (F[3,567.87]=6.95, p<.001). Examination of parameter estimates, with craving specified as the reference category for symptom groups, indicated significant variation in symptom change across days in treatment. Compared to craving, which decreased at b=-0.12 (p=.009) units per day, pain increased at b=0.13 (p<.001) daily units, and both stress and withdrawal symptoms increased at b=0.07 (p=.020) daily units. Conclusions: During early MOUD treatment, symptoms appear to fluctuate across patients and symptom types. While some symptoms are alleviated (e.g., craving) over time, others are increased (e.g., pain). Though replications in larger samples are required, these results indicate the need for adjunctive interventions for symptoms less responsive to MOUD.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Qualitative analysis of the lived experience of reproductive and pediatric health care in the military health care system

    Abstract: Introduction: Persistent inequities exist in obstetric and neonatal outcomes in military families despite universal health care coverage. Though the exact underlying cause has not been identified, social determinants of health may uniquely impact military families. The purpose of this study was to qualitatively investigate the potential impact of social determinants of health and the lived experiences of military individuals seeking maternity care in the Military Health System. Materials and methods: This was an Institutional Review Board-approved protocol. Nine providers conducted 31 semi-structured interviews with individuals who delivered within the last 5 years in the direct or purchased care market. Participants were recruited through social media blasts and clinic flyers with both maximum variation and homogenous sampling to ensure participation of diverse individuals. Data were coded and themes were identified using inductive qualitative research methods. Results: Three main themes were identified: Requirements of Military Life (with subthemes of pregnancy notification and privacy during care, role of pregnancy instructions and policies, and role of command support), Sociocultural Aspects of the Military Experience (with subthemes of pregnancy as a burden on colleagues and a career detractor, postpartum adjustment, balancing personal and professional requirements, pregnancy timing and parenting challenges, and importance of friendship and camaraderie in pregnancy), and Navigating the Healthcare Experience (including subthemes of transfer between military and civilian care and TRICARE challenges, perception of military care as inferior to civilian, and remote duty stations and international care). Conclusions: The unique stressors of military life act synergistically with the existing health care challenges, presenting opportunities for improvements in care. Such opportunities may include increased consistency of policies across services and commands. Increased access to group prenatal care and support groups, and increased assistance with navigating the health care system to improve care transitions were frequently requested changes by participants.