Are Veterans at increased risk of myeloproliferative neoplasms?

Abstract: Persian Gulf War-era Veterans were found to have a younger age at diagnosis and shorter overall survival (OS) for myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) compared to Korean and Vietnam War-era Veterans. This disparity may result from immortal time bias, where earlier-era Veterans with MPNs likely died prior to the study's 2006 start. Despite limitations inherent to retrospective studies, findings suggest military service may elevate MPN risk, potentially influenced by factors such as stress, inflammation, and exposure to bone marrow toxins. Increased risks associated with black race, smoking, and thrombosis or bleeding in MPNs align with existing research. Complex tumorigenesis processes challenge the attribution of somatic mutations like JAK2 to specific genotoxic exposures, with evidence suggesting early-life mutation acquisition accelerated by military-related stressors or toxic exposures. The study highlights the importance of integrating clinical phenotypes into the assessment of MPNs in military populations. Recommendations from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) emphasize leveraging cancer registries, addressing rare cancers, and considering demographic factors. Findings underscore the urgency of expanding presumed service-connected conditions to include MPNs for Veterans exposed to carcinogenic agents during service. The study also advocates for service connection as a means to enhance access to quality Veterans Health Administration (VHA) care, further supported by recent policy advancements under the PACT Act. These findings reinforce the need for data-driven policies to improve Veteran health outcomes and expand the scope of service-connected conditions for Gulf War-era Veterans.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    The impact of exposure to morally injurious events on posttraumatic stress symptoms among Israeli combat Veterans: a longitudinal moderated mediation model of moral injury outcomes and dispositional forgiveness

    Abstract: Background: Exposure to potentially morally injurious events (PMIEs) during military service can lead to moral injury (MI) outcomes and posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS). This longitudinal study examined the relationships between PMIE exposure, MI outcomes, and PTSS among Israeli combat veterans, and the potential protective role of dispositional forgiveness in these associations. Method: Participants were 169 Israeli combat veterans who participated in a six-year longitudinal study with four measurement points (T1: 12 months before enlistment, T2: Six months following enlistment- pre-deployment, T3: 18 months following enlistment- post-deployment, and T4: 28 months following discharge). Participants’ characteristics were assessed via semi-structured interviews (T1) and validated self-report measures (T2-T4) between 2019-2024. Results: Approximately 36% of participants reported exposure to PMIEs during service, with 13% exceeding the clinical threshold for probable PTSD at T4. PMIE-Betrayal at T3 was positively associated with MI outcomes of shame and trust violation at T4. The indirect effect of PMIEs on PTSS through MI outcome-Shame depended on forgiveness levels. Among veterans with low forgiveness, higher exposure to PMIE-Betrayal was associated with increased MI shame, which was linked to more severe PTSS. Conversely, for those with high forgiveness, exposure to PMIE-Self and Other was associated with decreased MI shame and subsequently reduced PTSS. Conclusion: Dispositional forgiveness moderates the relationship between PMIE exposure and MI outcomes, particularly shame, which mediates the development of PTSS. These findings highlight forgiveness as a potential target for intervention in treating moral injury and preventing PTSS among combat veterans.