Time to gender-affirming hormone therapy among US military-affiliated adolescents and young adults

Abstract: Importance: Use of exogenous sex steroid hormones, when indicated, may improve outcomes in adolescents and young adults with gender incongruence. Little is known about factors associated with the time from diagnosis of gender dysphoria to initiation of gender-affirming hormone therapy. Identification of inequities in time to treatment may have clinical, policy, and research implications. Objective: To evaluate factors associated with time to initiation of gender-affirming hormone therapy after a diagnosis of gender dysphoria in adolescents and young adults receiving care within the US Military Health System. Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective cohort study used TRICARE Prime billing and pharmacy data contained in the Military Health System Data Repository. Patients aged 14 to 22 years, excluding service members and their spouses, who received a diagnosis of gender dysphoria between September 1, 2016, and December 31, 2021, were included. The data were analyzed between August 30 and October 12, 2023. Exposures: Included patient characteristics were race and ethnicity, age group, first sex assigned in the medical record, and TRICARE Prime sponsor military rank and service at the time of diagnosis. Health care and contextual characteristics included the year of diagnosis and the primary system in which the patient received health care. Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was the time between initial diagnosis of gender dysphoria to the first prescription for gender-affirming hormone medication within a 2-year period. A Poisson generalized additive model was used to evaluate this primary outcome. Adjusted probability estimates were calculated per specified reference categories. Results: Of the 3066 patients included (median [IQR] age, 17 [15-19] years; 2259 with first assigned gender marker of female [74%]), an unadjusted survival model accounting for censoring indicated that 37% (95% CI, 35%-39%) initiated therapy by 2 years. Age-adjusted curves indicated that the proportion initiating therapy by 2 years increased by age category (aged 14-16 years, 25%; aged 17-18 years, 39%; aged 19-22 years, 55%). Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and 2-year adjusted probabilities indicated that longer times to hormone initiation were experienced by adolescents aged 14 to 16 years (IRR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.30-0.44) and 17 to 18 years (IRR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.54-0.79) compared with young adults aged 19 to 22 years and Black compared with White adolescents (IRR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.54-0.99). Senior officer compared with junior enlisted insurance sponsor rank (IRR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.04-3.55) and civilian compared with military health care setting (IRR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.02-1.43) was associated with shorter time to hormone initiation. Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study, most adolescents and young adults with a diagnosis of gender dysphoria receiving health care through the US military did not initiate exogenous sex steroid hormone therapy within 2 years of diagnosis. Inequities in time to treatment indicate the need to identify and reduce barriers to care.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Qualitative analysis of the lived experience of reproductive and pediatric health care in the military health care system

    Abstract: Introduction: Persistent inequities exist in obstetric and neonatal outcomes in military families despite universal health care coverage. Though the exact underlying cause has not been identified, social determinants of health may uniquely impact military families. The purpose of this study was to qualitatively investigate the potential impact of social determinants of health and the lived experiences of military individuals seeking maternity care in the Military Health System. Materials and methods: This was an Institutional Review Board-approved protocol. Nine providers conducted 31 semi-structured interviews with individuals who delivered within the last 5 years in the direct or purchased care market. Participants were recruited through social media blasts and clinic flyers with both maximum variation and homogenous sampling to ensure participation of diverse individuals. Data were coded and themes were identified using inductive qualitative research methods. Results: Three main themes were identified: Requirements of Military Life (with subthemes of pregnancy notification and privacy during care, role of pregnancy instructions and policies, and role of command support), Sociocultural Aspects of the Military Experience (with subthemes of pregnancy as a burden on colleagues and a career detractor, postpartum adjustment, balancing personal and professional requirements, pregnancy timing and parenting challenges, and importance of friendship and camaraderie in pregnancy), and Navigating the Healthcare Experience (including subthemes of transfer between military and civilian care and TRICARE challenges, perception of military care as inferior to civilian, and remote duty stations and international care). Conclusions: The unique stressors of military life act synergistically with the existing health care challenges, presenting opportunities for improvements in care. Such opportunities may include increased consistency of policies across services and commands. Increased access to group prenatal care and support groups, and increased assistance with navigating the health care system to improve care transitions were frequently requested changes by participants.