All-cause mortality among United States military personnel: Findings from the Millennium Cohort Study, 2001–2021

Abstract: Purpose: The goal of this study was to estimate all-cause mortality among Operations Enduring Freedom, Iraqi Freedom, and New Dawn era service members and veterans and to identify protective and risk factors for mortality. Methods: Using 20 years of longitudinal data from the Millennium Cohort Study (2001–2021), sequential Cox proportional hazard models were conducted to examine demographic, military, and health-related characteristics associated with all-cause mortality among service members and veterans. Results: Among 201,619 participants, 3806 (1.9 %) were deceased by the end of the observation period, with an age- and sex-adjusted incidence of 37.6 deaths per 100,000 person-years. Deployed service members had lower all-cause mortality risk than those who did not deploy. Personnel who experienced combat had higher mortality risk compared with those who did not in unadjusted models; this association was nonsignificant after accounting for health-related factors. Enlisted and Army personnel both had a higher mortality risk, while women and Hispanic individuals had a lower risk. Stressful life events, lower physical health related quality of life, problem drinking, and smoking were also associated with greater mortality risk. Conclusion: These profiles may be useful for developing preventive education and intervention efforts in military and veteran populations to reduce premature mortality.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Policy & Practice

    Bridging the research-to-practice gap: Implementation science approaches to transform health care delivery

    Abstract: Health care faces a persistent research-to-practice gap, with evidence-based innovations taking 17-20 years to reach routine clinical practice and less than 50% being successfully implemented. This introduction to the special section on implementation science presents 27 studies across two editions that demonstrate how systematic implementation science approaches can transform health care delivery. The first edition focuses on mental health services, examining evidence-based psychotherapy implementation, suicide prevention programs, and health equity initiatives across diverse populations including Veterans, incarcerated individuals, and marginalized communities. The second edition explores implementation frameworks, screening and assessment innovations, and approaches for vulnerable populations in complex health care settings. Key findings reveal that contextual adaptation, stakeholder engagement, and organizational support are critical for successful implementation. These articles provide empirical evidence that implementation science can significantly reduce the research-to-practice gap while improving intervention fidelity and sustainability, offering important insights for researchers, clinicians, administrators, and policymakers committed to evidence-based health care delivery.