Trust your dog: Training service dogs for U.S. Veterans with PTSD

Abstract: "Trust Your Dog: Training Service Dogs for U.S. Veterans with PTSD" investigates what it means for veterans with PTSD (Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder) to come to trust their service dogs by means of training with non-for-profit organizations that instruct and/or provide dogs at no expense. Ethnographic research for this dissertation took place in Chicago and Wisconsin part-time for two years and full time for a year with four organizations that train service dogs. I shadowed dog trainings, both in training centers and in public, attended graduations and dedications, worked dogs in training, and followed trainers and veterans with their service dogs in training. The research also included virtual interviews with out of state organizations, where I learned about the history of the service dog industry and about general training standards. This dissertation analyzes the tensions inherent in a veteran trusting a service dog: even though the dog appears to lack agency due to its operant conditioning, the dog does take initiative to alert and task for its veteran. Veterans can trust their dogs expressly because the dogs act on their own discretion when needed and at other times maintain strict obedience. The dissertation starts by looking at the institutional history of the service dog industry, which, due to a lack of governmental standardization, led to a crisis of legitimacy: without any certification, how can a dog be legitimized and thereby trusted to be safe in public with disabled persons? Out of this came accrediting organizations as experts that set “standards of excellence” and eventually collaborated with government agencies. These accrediting organizations – alongside non-accredited organizations, veterans, dogs, trainers, and so forth – make up the PTSD service dog industry, which, by focusing on public access, projects onto veterans the moral project of achieving ordinary American sociality with a service dog by feeling safe in public as consumers. The service dog allows for disabled veterans to live a good life in the everyday present rather than focusing on a future cure, in part because the service dog makes veterans feel safe in public and also because the dog functions as medical equipment for its veteran. Service dogs are an animated kind of medical equipment that can accomplish tasks material medical objects cannot, such as sensing an oncoming panic attack. They can do this because the dogs and veterans are connected through affective bonds that we may envisage as motivation for the dog to work and encouragement for the veteran to trust their dog. It is because the dog has agency in an unequal relation of symbiosis in submission that dogs can learn obedience and decide to improvise when they run out of ways to draw their veteran’s attention to anxiety or some kind of physical condition.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Qualitative analysis of the lived experience of reproductive and pediatric health care in the military health care system

    Abstract: Introduction: Persistent inequities exist in obstetric and neonatal outcomes in military families despite universal health care coverage. Though the exact underlying cause has not been identified, social determinants of health may uniquely impact military families. The purpose of this study was to qualitatively investigate the potential impact of social determinants of health and the lived experiences of military individuals seeking maternity care in the Military Health System. Materials and methods: This was an Institutional Review Board-approved protocol. Nine providers conducted 31 semi-structured interviews with individuals who delivered within the last 5 years in the direct or purchased care market. Participants were recruited through social media blasts and clinic flyers with both maximum variation and homogenous sampling to ensure participation of diverse individuals. Data were coded and themes were identified using inductive qualitative research methods. Results: Three main themes were identified: Requirements of Military Life (with subthemes of pregnancy notification and privacy during care, role of pregnancy instructions and policies, and role of command support), Sociocultural Aspects of the Military Experience (with subthemes of pregnancy as a burden on colleagues and a career detractor, postpartum adjustment, balancing personal and professional requirements, pregnancy timing and parenting challenges, and importance of friendship and camaraderie in pregnancy), and Navigating the Healthcare Experience (including subthemes of transfer between military and civilian care and TRICARE challenges, perception of military care as inferior to civilian, and remote duty stations and international care). Conclusions: The unique stressors of military life act synergistically with the existing health care challenges, presenting opportunities for improvements in care. Such opportunities may include increased consistency of policies across services and commands. Increased access to group prenatal care and support groups, and increased assistance with navigating the health care system to improve care transitions were frequently requested changes by participants.