Gatekeepers of justice: Law enforcement attitudes about and decisions with Veterans

Abstract: The occurrence of mental health problems among military veterans is high (Kulka et al., 1988; Milliken et al., 2007) and has been linked to criminal justice involvement of veterans (Greenberg & Rosenheck, 2009; Institute of Medicine, 2010). The Sequential Intercept Model (SIM; Griffin et al., 2015) was created and adapted to address the needs of justice-involved veterans (JIVs). The SIM consists of six points that serve as digression points diverting veterans away from the criminal justice system (Blue-Howells et al., 2013). Prior decision-making research related to JIVs in the SIM focused on intercept three (court system). Given that Law Enforcement Officers (LEOs) are the gatekeepers of the criminal justice process, research examining the unique interactions between LEOs, and veterans is essential. Police decision making research has examined mental illness stigma (Soomro & Yanos, 2019), perceived dangerousness (Watson et al., 2004a), blameworthiness (Jones et al., 2021), and punitiveness (Mendias & Kehoe, 2006) as factors that influence LEOs decisions. A specific gap in the literature is identifying the beliefs LEOs hold towards veterans. The first aim of this study was the development of a measure which assessed LEOs beliefs about military veterans. Secondly, this study extends the current literature through examining the effects of mental illness stigma, blameworthiness, perceived dangerousness, punitiveness on LEOs response (i.e., arrest, warning/informal sanction, transport to psychiatric facility, or no action) to case scenario depicting a military veteran exhibiting symptoms of PTSD and law-breaking behavior. Results indicate LEOs view veterans as exceptional people and as burdensome to their communities. Further, subtle mental illness stigma and veterans as a burden were associated with endorsement of a criminal justice response. However, when the LEOs ultimate response was evaluated, none of the variables were predictive of the decision. Implications regarding LEO trainings regarding veteran-LEO interactions and the contribution of these results to the SIM is also discussed.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Qualitative analysis of the lived experience of reproductive and pediatric health care in the military health care system

    Abstract: Introduction: Persistent inequities exist in obstetric and neonatal outcomes in military families despite universal health care coverage. Though the exact underlying cause has not been identified, social determinants of health may uniquely impact military families. The purpose of this study was to qualitatively investigate the potential impact of social determinants of health and the lived experiences of military individuals seeking maternity care in the Military Health System. Materials and methods: This was an Institutional Review Board-approved protocol. Nine providers conducted 31 semi-structured interviews with individuals who delivered within the last 5 years in the direct or purchased care market. Participants were recruited through social media blasts and clinic flyers with both maximum variation and homogenous sampling to ensure participation of diverse individuals. Data were coded and themes were identified using inductive qualitative research methods. Results: Three main themes were identified: Requirements of Military Life (with subthemes of pregnancy notification and privacy during care, role of pregnancy instructions and policies, and role of command support), Sociocultural Aspects of the Military Experience (with subthemes of pregnancy as a burden on colleagues and a career detractor, postpartum adjustment, balancing personal and professional requirements, pregnancy timing and parenting challenges, and importance of friendship and camaraderie in pregnancy), and Navigating the Healthcare Experience (including subthemes of transfer between military and civilian care and TRICARE challenges, perception of military care as inferior to civilian, and remote duty stations and international care). Conclusions: The unique stressors of military life act synergistically with the existing health care challenges, presenting opportunities for improvements in care. Such opportunities may include increased consistency of policies across services and commands. Increased access to group prenatal care and support groups, and increased assistance with navigating the health care system to improve care transitions were frequently requested changes by participants.

    Physical Health Peer reviewed