Sharing of military Veterans’ mental health data across Canada: A scoping review

Abstract: Introduction: Data on Canadian military Veterans’ mental health are needed to develop and improve mental health services. It is not clear to what extent such data are available and connected across sources. Methods: A scoping review of peer-reviewed journal articles (white literature) and government and organizational resources (grey literature) was conducted to identify sources of Canadian Veteran mental health data, linkages between them, and policies or guidelines related to information sharing across sources. Results: Ten different data sources related to military Veterans’ mental health in Canada were found, particularly Statistics Canada data sets and administrative data sets such as those of Veterans Affairs Canada. These data sources are shared in a few ways that have advantages and disadvantages. No policies or guidelines were found that specifically address information sharing across these data sets. Discussion: Secure, Accessible, eFfective, and Efficient (SAFE) information sharing across these data sources is implied but not confirmed. Key challenges involve lack of centralization (or coordination), lack of (systematic) collaboration, lack of specific policies (and guidelines), and lack of standardization. It is recommended that consideration be given to establishing a repository of relevant data sets, policies, and guidelines for information sharing across all relevant data sets (addressing collaboration across Canadian jurisdictions and SAFEty measures) and standardization across such data sets.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Policy & Practice

    Bridging the research-to-practice gap: Implementation science approaches to transform health care delivery

    Abstract: Health care faces a persistent research-to-practice gap, with evidence-based innovations taking 17-20 years to reach routine clinical practice and less than 50% being successfully implemented. This introduction to the special section on implementation science presents 27 studies across two editions that demonstrate how systematic implementation science approaches can transform health care delivery. The first edition focuses on mental health services, examining evidence-based psychotherapy implementation, suicide prevention programs, and health equity initiatives across diverse populations including Veterans, incarcerated individuals, and marginalized communities. The second edition explores implementation frameworks, screening and assessment innovations, and approaches for vulnerable populations in complex health care settings. Key findings reveal that contextual adaptation, stakeholder engagement, and organizational support are critical for successful implementation. These articles provide empirical evidence that implementation science can significantly reduce the research-to-practice gap while improving intervention fidelity and sustainability, offering important insights for researchers, clinicians, administrators, and policymakers committed to evidence-based health care delivery.