Interactive effects of genetic liability and combat exposure on risk of alcohol use disorder among US service members

Abstract: Background: An improved understanding of pathways to alcohol use disorder (AUD) among service members may inform efforts to reduce the substantial burden of AUD on this population. This study examined whether the relationship between a service-related risk factor (combat exposure) and later AUD varied based on individual differences in genetic liability to AUD. Methods: The sample consisted of 1,203 US Army soldiers of genetically determined European ancestry who provided survey and genomic data in the Army STARRS Pre/Post Deployment Study (PPDS; 2012-2014) and follow-up survey data in wave 1 of the STARRS Longitudinal Study (2016-2018). Logistic regression was used to estimate the conditional effect of combat exposure level (self-reported in PPDS) on odds of probable AUD diagnosis at follow-up, as a function of a soldier’s polygenic risk score (PRS) for AUD. Results: The direct effect of combat exposure on AUD risk was non-significant (AOR=1.12, 95% CI=1.00–1.26, p=.051); however, a significant combat exposure x PRS interaction was observed (AOR=1.60, 95% CI=1.03–2.46, p=.033). Higher combat exposure was more strongly associated with elevated AUD risk among soldiers with heightened genetic liability to AUD. Conclusions: The effect of combat exposure on AUD risk appeared to vary based on a service member’s level of genetic risk for AUD. Continued investigation is warranted to determine whether PRS can help stratify AUD risk within stress-exposed groups such as combat-deployed soldiers. Such efforts might reveal opportunities to focus prevention efforts on smaller subgroups at the intersection of having both environmental exposures and genetic vulnerability to AUD.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Qualitative analysis of the lived experience of reproductive and pediatric health care in the military health care system

    Abstract: Introduction: Persistent inequities exist in obstetric and neonatal outcomes in military families despite universal health care coverage. Though the exact underlying cause has not been identified, social determinants of health may uniquely impact military families. The purpose of this study was to qualitatively investigate the potential impact of social determinants of health and the lived experiences of military individuals seeking maternity care in the Military Health System. Materials and methods: This was an Institutional Review Board-approved protocol. Nine providers conducted 31 semi-structured interviews with individuals who delivered within the last 5 years in the direct or purchased care market. Participants were recruited through social media blasts and clinic flyers with both maximum variation and homogenous sampling to ensure participation of diverse individuals. Data were coded and themes were identified using inductive qualitative research methods. Results: Three main themes were identified: Requirements of Military Life (with subthemes of pregnancy notification and privacy during care, role of pregnancy instructions and policies, and role of command support), Sociocultural Aspects of the Military Experience (with subthemes of pregnancy as a burden on colleagues and a career detractor, postpartum adjustment, balancing personal and professional requirements, pregnancy timing and parenting challenges, and importance of friendship and camaraderie in pregnancy), and Navigating the Healthcare Experience (including subthemes of transfer between military and civilian care and TRICARE challenges, perception of military care as inferior to civilian, and remote duty stations and international care). Conclusions: The unique stressors of military life act synergistically with the existing health care challenges, presenting opportunities for improvements in care. Such opportunities may include increased consistency of policies across services and commands. Increased access to group prenatal care and support groups, and increased assistance with navigating the health care system to improve care transitions were frequently requested changes by participants.