Design and methodology of a randomized clinical trial of quetiapine to reduce central nervous system polypharmacy in Veterans with postconcussive syndrome symptoms

Abstract: Lack of evidence to guide medication treatments for mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) in veterans too often results in polypharmacy practices attempting to provide symptomatic relief from multiple postconcussive syndrome symptoms. Therefore, the field needs to find an effective medication that reduces the burden of postconcussive symptoms without complicating the treatment burden of veterans. This clinical trial seeks to determine whether switching veterans to quetiapine monotherapy (intervention) is superior to continuing to receive treatment as usual (TAU, control) polypharmacy for veterans with symptoms of postconcussive syndrome and posttraumatic stress disorder who are receiving rehabilitation treatment for mTBI. This study will test the conceptual mediation model hypothesis that quetiapine monotherapy may enhance recovery from mTBI by (1) increasing engagement in rehabilitation services, and/or (2) reducing the adverse effects of TAU polypharmacy. This study will enroll 146 patients from two Veterans Administration Medical Centers into a 12- week phase III, randomized, pragmatic clinical trial comparing outcomes from treatment with quetiapine monotherapy and TAU. Quetiapine will be cross tapered up to a maximum dose of 200 mg (as tolerated) as other medications are discontinued. The primary outcome measures are postconcussive syndrome symptoms (Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory), functional disability (World Health Organization Disability Assessment), and quality of life (World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment). Overall, this study aims to determine whether quetiapine monotherapy is superior to TAU polypharmacy and improves the quality of life for veterans with comorbid postconcussive syndrome and posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms who are receiving rehabilitation treatment for mTBI.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Qualitative analysis of the lived experience of reproductive and pediatric health care in the military health care system

    Abstract: Introduction: Persistent inequities exist in obstetric and neonatal outcomes in military families despite universal health care coverage. Though the exact underlying cause has not been identified, social determinants of health may uniquely impact military families. The purpose of this study was to qualitatively investigate the potential impact of social determinants of health and the lived experiences of military individuals seeking maternity care in the Military Health System. Materials and methods: This was an Institutional Review Board-approved protocol. Nine providers conducted 31 semi-structured interviews with individuals who delivered within the last 5 years in the direct or purchased care market. Participants were recruited through social media blasts and clinic flyers with both maximum variation and homogenous sampling to ensure participation of diverse individuals. Data were coded and themes were identified using inductive qualitative research methods. Results: Three main themes were identified: Requirements of Military Life (with subthemes of pregnancy notification and privacy during care, role of pregnancy instructions and policies, and role of command support), Sociocultural Aspects of the Military Experience (with subthemes of pregnancy as a burden on colleagues and a career detractor, postpartum adjustment, balancing personal and professional requirements, pregnancy timing and parenting challenges, and importance of friendship and camaraderie in pregnancy), and Navigating the Healthcare Experience (including subthemes of transfer between military and civilian care and TRICARE challenges, perception of military care as inferior to civilian, and remote duty stations and international care). Conclusions: The unique stressors of military life act synergistically with the existing health care challenges, presenting opportunities for improvements in care. Such opportunities may include increased consistency of policies across services and commands. Increased access to group prenatal care and support groups, and increased assistance with navigating the health care system to improve care transitions were frequently requested changes by participants.