Frontal pole neuromodulation for impulsivity and suicidality in Veterans with mild traumatic brain injury and common co-occurring mental health conditions: Protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial

Abstract: Background: Suicide remains a leading cause of death among veterans in the United States, and mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) increases the risk of suicidal ideation (SI) and suicide attempts (SAs). mTBI worsens impulsivity and contributes to poor social and occupational functioning, which further increases the risk of SI and SAs. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation is a neuromodulatory treatment approach that induces neuroplasticity, potentially repairing neurodamage. Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) is a second-generation form of transcranial magnetic stimulation that is safe, shorter in duration, displays a minimal side effect profile and is a promising treatment approach for impulsivity in mTBI. Our novel proposed treatment protocol uses frontal pole iTBS to target the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, which may reduce impulsivity by strengthening functional connectivity between the limbic system and frontal cortex, allowing for improved top-down control of impulsive reactions, including SI and SAs. Objective: The objectives of this study are to (1) develop an iTBS intervention for veterans with mTBI, impulsivity, and SI; (2) assess the feasibility and tolerability of the intervention; and (3) gather preliminary clinical outcome data on SI, impulsivity, and functions that will guide future studies. Methods: This is a pilot, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial. In developing this protocol, we referenced the SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) guidelines. We will enroll 56 participants (28 active iTBS and 28 sham iTBS). The iTBS intervention will be performed daily, 5 days a week, for 2 weeks. We will collect 10 validated, psychometric, quantitative outcome measures before, during, and after the intervention. Measures included will assess functioning, impulsivity, suicidality, posttraumatic stress disorder, and depressive symptoms. We will collect qualitative data through semistructured interviews to elicit feedback on the participants' experiences and symptoms. We will perform quantitative and qualitative analyses to (1) assess the feasibility, tolerability, and acceptability of the treatment; (2) gather advanced neuroimaging data to assess neural changes elicited by treatment; and (3) assess improvements in outcome measures of impulsivity and suicidality in veterans with mTBI. Results: This study protocol was approved by the Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital Institutional Review Board (Hines IRB number 14-003). This novel treatment is a 5-year research project (April 1, 2023, to March 31, 2028) funded by the Veterans Administration Rehabilitation Research and Development service (CDA2 award IK2 RX002938). Study results will be disseminated at or before the project's end date in March 2028. Conclusions: We will provide preliminary evidence of the safety, feasibility, and acceptability of a novel frontal pole iTBS treatment for mTBI, impulsivity, SI and SAs, and functional deficits.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Qualitative analysis of the lived experience of reproductive and pediatric health care in the military health care system

    Abstract: Introduction: Persistent inequities exist in obstetric and neonatal outcomes in military families despite universal health care coverage. Though the exact underlying cause has not been identified, social determinants of health may uniquely impact military families. The purpose of this study was to qualitatively investigate the potential impact of social determinants of health and the lived experiences of military individuals seeking maternity care in the Military Health System. Materials and methods: This was an Institutional Review Board-approved protocol. Nine providers conducted 31 semi-structured interviews with individuals who delivered within the last 5 years in the direct or purchased care market. Participants were recruited through social media blasts and clinic flyers with both maximum variation and homogenous sampling to ensure participation of diverse individuals. Data were coded and themes were identified using inductive qualitative research methods. Results: Three main themes were identified: Requirements of Military Life (with subthemes of pregnancy notification and privacy during care, role of pregnancy instructions and policies, and role of command support), Sociocultural Aspects of the Military Experience (with subthemes of pregnancy as a burden on colleagues and a career detractor, postpartum adjustment, balancing personal and professional requirements, pregnancy timing and parenting challenges, and importance of friendship and camaraderie in pregnancy), and Navigating the Healthcare Experience (including subthemes of transfer between military and civilian care and TRICARE challenges, perception of military care as inferior to civilian, and remote duty stations and international care). Conclusions: The unique stressors of military life act synergistically with the existing health care challenges, presenting opportunities for improvements in care. Such opportunities may include increased consistency of policies across services and commands. Increased access to group prenatal care and support groups, and increased assistance with navigating the health care system to improve care transitions were frequently requested changes by participants.

    Physical Health Peer reviewed