Inequities in physical therapy receipt of US service members and Veterans with low back pain

Abstract: Objective: To investigate inequities in time-to physical therapy for patients with low back pain. Design: Retrospective observational study utilizing data from the Department of Defense and Veterans Health Administration clinical and administrative data repositories derived from medical records, claims, and enrollment data. Setting: Military Health System, Veterans Health System, and civilian healthcare facilities. Participants: Active duty service members, veterans and retirees seeking healthcare for low back pain between January 2017 and December 2020, with no low back pain diagnoses for at least 1 year prior (N =1,252,959). Interventions: Not Applicable. Main Outcome Measure(s): Time-to-outpatient physical therapy evaluation within 13 weeks of low back pain diagnosis. Results: Approximately 9.4% of included patients received an outpatient physical therapy evaluation from a physical therapist within 13 weeks of diagnosis. In a piecewise exponential additive model, many covariates were time-varying such that the probability of physical therapy receipt varied throughout the 13-week period. Black, Latinx, and American Indian and Alaskan Native patients had lower probabilities of physical therapy receipt relative to white patients from 1 week to 3-6 weeks after index diagnosis. At 5 and 7 weeks, Black and Latinx patients, respectively, were more likely to receive physical therapy than white patients, which continued till the end of the observation period. Patients assigned female relative to patients assigned male had a higher probability of initiating physical therapy across the entire observation window, as did active duty service members, relative to retired service members and veterans. Conclusions: Inequities in the timing and receipt of physical therapy exist in the US Military Health System and Veterans Health Administration by race and ethnicity, assigned sex, and beneficiary group. Standardizing referral and practice patterns, improving accessibility of physical therapy services and encouraging health seeking behavior may help alleviate the inequities in initiating physical therapy.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Qualitative analysis of the lived experience of reproductive and pediatric health care in the military health care system

    Abstract: Introduction: Persistent inequities exist in obstetric and neonatal outcomes in military families despite universal health care coverage. Though the exact underlying cause has not been identified, social determinants of health may uniquely impact military families. The purpose of this study was to qualitatively investigate the potential impact of social determinants of health and the lived experiences of military individuals seeking maternity care in the Military Health System. Materials and methods: This was an Institutional Review Board-approved protocol. Nine providers conducted 31 semi-structured interviews with individuals who delivered within the last 5 years in the direct or purchased care market. Participants were recruited through social media blasts and clinic flyers with both maximum variation and homogenous sampling to ensure participation of diverse individuals. Data were coded and themes were identified using inductive qualitative research methods. Results: Three main themes were identified: Requirements of Military Life (with subthemes of pregnancy notification and privacy during care, role of pregnancy instructions and policies, and role of command support), Sociocultural Aspects of the Military Experience (with subthemes of pregnancy as a burden on colleagues and a career detractor, postpartum adjustment, balancing personal and professional requirements, pregnancy timing and parenting challenges, and importance of friendship and camaraderie in pregnancy), and Navigating the Healthcare Experience (including subthemes of transfer between military and civilian care and TRICARE challenges, perception of military care as inferior to civilian, and remote duty stations and international care). Conclusions: The unique stressors of military life act synergistically with the existing health care challenges, presenting opportunities for improvements in care. Such opportunities may include increased consistency of policies across services and commands. Increased access to group prenatal care and support groups, and increased assistance with navigating the health care system to improve care transitions were frequently requested changes by participants.