Systemic predictors of diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema in an adult Veteran population

Abstract: Purpose: To investigate the influence of systemic and serum measures and hypoglycemic medications on the initial presentation and ongoing development of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic macular edema (DME). Design: Using Veterans Affairs electronic health records, we identified patients with a diabetes mellitus diagnosis and at least one eye examination between 1997 and 2010. After adjusting for sociodemographic factors, we used multivariable Cox regression models to evaluate the association of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels, blood pressure, albuminuria, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and prescribed medications with the subsequent diagnosis of 1) any diabetic eye disease (defined for this analysis as DR and/or DME, 2) diabetic retinopathy, and 3) diabetic macular edema. Results: Of 4089 diabetic Veteran patients, 821 (20%) were subsequently diagnosed with diabetic retinopathy and 88 (2%) had macular edema. Patients were more likely to receive a diabetic retinopathy diagnosis if they presented with HbA1c > 8.5 (HR=2.66, 95% CI 1.88-3.77, p<0.01), systolic blood pressure > 140 mmHg (HR=1.45, 95% CI 1.26-1.66, p<0.01), blood urea nitrogen (BUN) > 35 mg/dL (HR=2.17, 95% CI 1.60-2.93, p<0.01), and/or used insulin (HR=2.04, 95% CI 1.74-2.40, p<0.01). Patients were more likely to be diagnosed with diabetic macular edema if they had systolic blood pressure > 140 mmHg (HR=2.00, CI 1.29-3.08, p<0.01) and/or used insulin (HR=2.48, CI 1.53-4.03, p<0.01). Conclusion: Markers of systemic health may be useful predictors for incident diabetic retinopathy or diabetic macular edema, evaluated collectively in Veteran patients. Higher HbA1c levels, systolic blood pressure, BUN levels, and insulin use (suggestive of more severe and/or long-standing diabetes) appear to be highly associated with the development of diabetic eye disease, and, in particular, diabetic retinopathy.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Qualitative analysis of the lived experience of reproductive and pediatric health care in the military health care system

    Abstract: Introduction: Persistent inequities exist in obstetric and neonatal outcomes in military families despite universal health care coverage. Though the exact underlying cause has not been identified, social determinants of health may uniquely impact military families. The purpose of this study was to qualitatively investigate the potential impact of social determinants of health and the lived experiences of military individuals seeking maternity care in the Military Health System. Materials and methods: This was an Institutional Review Board-approved protocol. Nine providers conducted 31 semi-structured interviews with individuals who delivered within the last 5 years in the direct or purchased care market. Participants were recruited through social media blasts and clinic flyers with both maximum variation and homogenous sampling to ensure participation of diverse individuals. Data were coded and themes were identified using inductive qualitative research methods. Results: Three main themes were identified: Requirements of Military Life (with subthemes of pregnancy notification and privacy during care, role of pregnancy instructions and policies, and role of command support), Sociocultural Aspects of the Military Experience (with subthemes of pregnancy as a burden on colleagues and a career detractor, postpartum adjustment, balancing personal and professional requirements, pregnancy timing and parenting challenges, and importance of friendship and camaraderie in pregnancy), and Navigating the Healthcare Experience (including subthemes of transfer between military and civilian care and TRICARE challenges, perception of military care as inferior to civilian, and remote duty stations and international care). Conclusions: The unique stressors of military life act synergistically with the existing health care challenges, presenting opportunities for improvements in care. Such opportunities may include increased consistency of policies across services and commands. Increased access to group prenatal care and support groups, and increased assistance with navigating the health care system to improve care transitions were frequently requested changes by participants.

    Physical Health Peer reviewed