Mortality, hepatic decompensation, and cardiovascular outcomes in lean vs. non-lean metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) cirrhosis: A Veterans Affairs cohort study

Abstract: Background and aims: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) has a global prevalence of 25%. Studies on incident liver and cardiovascular outcomes in lean (Body mass index: BMI < 25 kg/m(2), or < 23 kg/m(2) for Asians) vs. non-lean individuals with MASLD have reported mixed results. We aimed to compare incident clinical outcomes and mortality between lean and non-lean individuals with compensated MASLD cirrhosis in a large national cohort. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with newly diagnosed compensated MASLD cirrhosis in the Veterans Health Administration between 01/2008 and 05/2021. The primary outcome was incident hepatic decompensation, and secondary outcomes were incident major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and all-cause mortality. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess association. Fine and Gray competing risk regression was used where applicable. Results: The study included 15155 patients with MASLD cirrhosis: 1,597 lean and 13558 non-lean patients. Included patients were mostly male (95%), median age was 67 years, and 72.8% were non-Hispanic white. At baseline, the prevalence of diabetes was lower in lean vs. non-lean individuals (46.7 vs. 73.9%, p < 0.001). In multivariable models, lean status was associated with a 64% increased risk of all-cause mortality (aHR = 1.64) but decreased risk of hepatic decompensation (aSHR = 0.67). Lean individuals experienced significantly higher rates of cardiovascular-related mortality (aHR = 1.40). Conclusion: Lean MASLD patients with compensated cirrhosis had a higher mortality risk but a lower risk of hepatic decompensation than non-lean patients. Despite having a better baseline cardiometabolic profile and similar rates of MACE, lean individuals with MASLD cirrhosis have a higher risk of cardiovascular mortality.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Qualitative analysis of the lived experience of reproductive and pediatric health care in the military health care system

    Abstract: Introduction: Persistent inequities exist in obstetric and neonatal outcomes in military families despite universal health care coverage. Though the exact underlying cause has not been identified, social determinants of health may uniquely impact military families. The purpose of this study was to qualitatively investigate the potential impact of social determinants of health and the lived experiences of military individuals seeking maternity care in the Military Health System. Materials and methods: This was an Institutional Review Board-approved protocol. Nine providers conducted 31 semi-structured interviews with individuals who delivered within the last 5 years in the direct or purchased care market. Participants were recruited through social media blasts and clinic flyers with both maximum variation and homogenous sampling to ensure participation of diverse individuals. Data were coded and themes were identified using inductive qualitative research methods. Results: Three main themes were identified: Requirements of Military Life (with subthemes of pregnancy notification and privacy during care, role of pregnancy instructions and policies, and role of command support), Sociocultural Aspects of the Military Experience (with subthemes of pregnancy as a burden on colleagues and a career detractor, postpartum adjustment, balancing personal and professional requirements, pregnancy timing and parenting challenges, and importance of friendship and camaraderie in pregnancy), and Navigating the Healthcare Experience (including subthemes of transfer between military and civilian care and TRICARE challenges, perception of military care as inferior to civilian, and remote duty stations and international care). Conclusions: The unique stressors of military life act synergistically with the existing health care challenges, presenting opportunities for improvements in care. Such opportunities may include increased consistency of policies across services and commands. Increased access to group prenatal care and support groups, and increased assistance with navigating the health care system to improve care transitions were frequently requested changes by participants.