Poor long-term outcomes and abnormal neurodegeneration biomarkers after military traumatic brain injury: The armed services trauma rehabilitation outcome study

Abstract: Background: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is common in military campaigns and is a risk factor for dementia. ArmeD SerVices TrAuma and RehabilitatioN OutComE-TBI (ADVANCE-TBI) aims to ascertain neurological outcomes in UK military personnel with major battlefield trauma, leveraging advances in quantification of axonal breakdown markers like neurofilament light (NfL), and astroglial marker glial fibrillar acidic protein (GFAP) in blood. We aimed to describe the causes, prevalence and consequences of TBI, and its fluid biomarker associations. Methods: TBI history was ascertained in 1145 servicemen and veterans, of whom 579 had been exposed to major trauma. Functional and mental health assessments were administered, and blood samples were collected approximately 8 years postinjury, with plasma biomarkers quantified (n=1125) for NfL, GFAP, total tau, phospho-tau(181), amyloid-β 42 and 40. Outcomes were related to neurotrauma exposure. Results: TBI was present in 16.9% (n=98) of exposed participants, with 46.9% classified as mild-probable and 53.1% classified as moderate to severe. Depression (β=1.65, 95% CI (1.33 to 2.03)), anxiety (β=1.65 (1.34 to 2.03)) and post-traumatic stress disorder (β=1.30 (1.19 to 1.41)) symptoms were more common after TBI, alongside poorer 6 minute walk distance (β=0.79 (0.74 to 0.84)) and quality of life (β=1.27 (1.19 to 1.36), all p<0.001). Plasma GFAP was 11% (95% CI 2 to 21) higher post-TBI (p=0.013), with greater concentrations in moderate-to-severe injuries (47% higher than mild-probable (95% CI 20% to 82%, p<0.001). Unemployment was more common among those with elevated GFAP levels post-TBI, showing a 1.14-fold increase (95% CI 1.03 to 1.27, p<0.001) for every doubling in GFAP concentration. Conclusions: TBI affected nearly a fifth of trauma-exposed personnel, related to worse mental health, motor and functional outcomes, as well as elevated plasma GFAP levels 8 years post-injury. This was absent after extracranial trauma, and showed a dose-response relationship with the severity of the injury.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Qualitative analysis of the lived experience of reproductive and pediatric health care in the military health care system

    Abstract: Introduction: Persistent inequities exist in obstetric and neonatal outcomes in military families despite universal health care coverage. Though the exact underlying cause has not been identified, social determinants of health may uniquely impact military families. The purpose of this study was to qualitatively investigate the potential impact of social determinants of health and the lived experiences of military individuals seeking maternity care in the Military Health System. Materials and methods: This was an Institutional Review Board-approved protocol. Nine providers conducted 31 semi-structured interviews with individuals who delivered within the last 5 years in the direct or purchased care market. Participants were recruited through social media blasts and clinic flyers with both maximum variation and homogenous sampling to ensure participation of diverse individuals. Data were coded and themes were identified using inductive qualitative research methods. Results: Three main themes were identified: Requirements of Military Life (with subthemes of pregnancy notification and privacy during care, role of pregnancy instructions and policies, and role of command support), Sociocultural Aspects of the Military Experience (with subthemes of pregnancy as a burden on colleagues and a career detractor, postpartum adjustment, balancing personal and professional requirements, pregnancy timing and parenting challenges, and importance of friendship and camaraderie in pregnancy), and Navigating the Healthcare Experience (including subthemes of transfer between military and civilian care and TRICARE challenges, perception of military care as inferior to civilian, and remote duty stations and international care). Conclusions: The unique stressors of military life act synergistically with the existing health care challenges, presenting opportunities for improvements in care. Such opportunities may include increased consistency of policies across services and commands. Increased access to group prenatal care and support groups, and increased assistance with navigating the health care system to improve care transitions were frequently requested changes by participants.

    Physical Health Peer reviewed