An examination of facilitators and barriers to care receipt among specific groups of LGBTQ+ and cisgender heterosexual Veterans

Abstract: This study examined rates and factors associated with past-year Veterans Health Administration (VHA) overall health care utilization and Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) mental health treatment among lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and other sexual and gender minority (LGBTQ+) and cisgender heterosexual veterans. Baseline data from a national longitudinal study of LGBTQ+ and cisgender heterosexual veteran VHA users and nonusers (N = 1,062) were used in generalized linear models to estimate the predicted prevalence of VHA health care utilization for each LGBTQ+ and cisgender subgroup, stratified by gender. Additional multivariable regressions were guided by the Andersen health services utilization model. There were no significant differences in health care utilization among women subgroups. Among male subgroups, cisgender gay men had a lower predicted prevalence of VHA utilization than cisgender heterosexual and transgender men. In both the women’s and men’s models, VHA eligibility indicators and perceived lack of service availability were associated with increased odds for any past-year utilization; higher income, difficulty understanding eligibility/benefits, and logistical barriers were associated with decreased odds. Lifetime harassment at VHA was positively associated with past-year overall VHA utilization in women’s models. LGBTQ+-specific factors explained significant variance in some models while transgender/gender-diverse-specific needs did not. These findings suggest that veterans generally need assistance navigating VHA eligibility issues and that LGBTQ+ veterans would benefit from systemic attention to provider sensitivity and availability of services focused on their needs. The high rates of harassment reported across women subgroups (19%–25%) and by transgender men (38%) warrant institution-wide action.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Policy & Practice

    Armed Forces Covenant toolkit: Updated edition (2025)

    Abstract: One of the key achievements of Forces in Mind Trust’s (FiMT) Our Community - Our Covenant series of reports, beginning in 2016, has been to establish a toolkit for local authorities to help them develop support for their local Armed Forces Community (AFC). The 2016 report launched the idea of a “core infrastructure”, supported by self-assessment questions and some wider tips. Formal research and informal engagement show that the toolkit still provides an important contribution to successful local delivery of Covenant pledges and wider AFC support. It’s a baseline in the face of ever-present funding stresses and a point of reference when there are changes in member and officer responsibilities. This means it is important that the toolkit remains up to date. It was last reviewed in 2022 and presented as an Annex to FiMT’s research report A Decade of the Covenant. Since then, there has been further research into local support for the Armed Forces Community for the next iteration of the Our Community - Our Covenant series. This updated toolkit reflects these recent findings about local practice as well as developments following the introduction in the Armed Forces Act 2021 of the duty of due regard to the principles of the Covenant in the focus areas of housing, education and healthcare. As with the original document, the toolkit remains targeted at local authorities. It covers their own direct role in supporting the local AFC, but also the crucial activity of convening local partnerships and so enabling effective local collaborative action. The key changes to the core infrastructure and self-assessment cover: (1) More emphasis on embedding AFC support into the mainstream of local authority work. (2) An extended top tips section with more advice based on recent research. (3) We have dropped the descriptive scenarios of challenges that members of the AFC face. These have now been overtaken by analytical scenarios included in the freely available national training material and in the Ministry of Defence’s (MoD) Covenant Legal Duty toolkit, which helps to explain the legal duty aspect of the Covenant. (4) Some additional material about the individual roles, collaboration, communication and vision and commitment elements of the core infrastructure. This toolkit update is being made in spring 2025 at a time when further change in the Covenant environment is likely, with potential extension of the Covenant duty and expected re-organisation in English local government and creation of new combined or strategic authorities. Additional modules could be added to the toolkit to reflect these ongoing policy developments.

    Education / Training Housing Peer reviewed