Use, benefits, and barriers to financial and credit counseling among Veterans according to financial counselors and other subject matter experts

Abstract: INTRODUCTION: Over a million U.S. veterans report an income below the poverty line. The Veterans Affairs (VA) offers financial literacy and money management education to promote veterans' economic well-being. This study examined perceptions of the barriers and facilitators to economic resources among financial providers and experts serving veterans. METHODS: This study implemented a VA Redcap survey constructed of closed-ended and open-ended questions to examine perceptions of financial programs. Descriptive statistics were used to examine the close-ended responses; qualitative analysis was performed on the open-ended responses. RESULTS: A total of 269 subject matter experts responded to the survey. Fifty-nine percent (n = 158) of respondents reported that financial counseling and education for veterans takes place outside of their local VA. Most frequently used services included financial coaching (46%; n = 124), assistance in attaining other sources of income (44%; n = 118), establishing a bank account (25%; n = 67), group financial education (23%; n = 62), and providing representative payee or conservator (19%; n = 51). Barriers to financial counseling and education exist with a lack of program awareness (70%; n = 188) and eligibility (66%; n = 178) being most often reported. CONCLUSION: Financial and money management interventions produce positive outcomes but should consider more effective modes in which to extend reach, education, and build trusting relationships in effort to increase financial stability and quality of life among low-income veterans.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Policy & Practice

    The ask, care, escort suite of trainings: Initial evaluation of the Army’s primary suicide prevention strategy

    Abstract: The U.S. Army’s Ask, Care, Escort (ACE) suicide gatekeeper training has been the annual requirement for all personnel since 2009; however, this training has never been formally evaluated. The present study evaluated three updated versions of ACE: a training for Army leaders (ACE-Suicide Intervention), a training for basic combat trainees (ACE for Basic Combat Training and One Station Unit Training), and a standard training for all personnel (ACE for the Force). Self-report surveys measured pre- to posttraining changes in objective and subjective knowledge and stigma, as well as preparedness, self-efficacy, and likelihood to engage in gatekeeper behaviors. Implementation outcomes, such as training acceptability, suitability, and usability were also assessed. Across these evaluations, participants reported that knowledge and gatekeeper behaviors significantly improved from pre- to posttraining. Implementation metrics revealed a high degree of acceptability and relevance for all three ACE trainings. Overall, the findings of these evaluations suggest important changes in key suicide prevention outcomes following the ACE suite of trainings. Further longitudinal assessment is needed to establish the full effectiveness of gatekeeper interventions in the Army.