Every-other-day iron supplementation in male Veterans with iron deficiency anaemia

Abstract: Background: Iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) is prevalent in the male veteran population and requires iron replacement. Current data on alternate-day dosing for oral iron supplementation in IDA has focused on younger women. Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of every-other-day (EOD) iron supplementation compared to daily dosing in men with IDA. Method: This was a retrospective chart review which included American male veterans, aged 18 years or older, who had been diagnosed with IDA. To be included, patients required a haemoglobin (Hb) value >7 g/dL (70 g/L) but <13 g/dL (130 g/L) prior to initiation of oral ferrous sulfate and completed at least 60 days of oral ferrous sulfate therapy between January 2017-July 2021. The primary objective was to evaluate the change in Hb lab values after at least 60 days of oral ferrous sulfate 325 mg regardless of dosage regimen (twice daily [BID], daily [QD], or EOD). The secondary objectives were to evaluate changes in haematocrit, ferritin, iron saturation, and iron levels. In addition, we evaluated the rate of gastrointestinal adverse events for the previously listed dosing of ferrous sulfate. This project was exempt due to the local policy requirements that constitute research by the Southern Arizona VA Health Care System Institutional Review Board (11 February 2022, Vice Chair). The justification for this exemption was as follows: the study only included data and analysis involving the use of identifiable health information for the purposes of research. The data collection and use of the data was covered under Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and for which a waiver of HIPPA authorisation was approved. Results: Eighteen patients were randomly selected for each dosing group. An increase in Hb (+/- standard deviation) of 16 g/L +/- 13 in the EOD dosing, 17 g/L +/- 17 in the QD group, and 21 g/L +/- 22 in the BID group. There was no statistical difference in change in Hb when the EOD group was compared to the QD or BID groups. There were also no statistical differences noted in the change of haematocrit, ferritin, iron level, or iron saturation between groups. The discontinuation rate in the EOD group was lower than those of the QD or BID groups (5.6%, 11.2%, and 11.7% respectively), though they were not statistically different. Conclusions: EOD dosing was comparable in efficacy to daily dosing in older men with IDA.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Qualitative analysis of the lived experience of reproductive and pediatric health care in the military health care system

    Abstract: Introduction: Persistent inequities exist in obstetric and neonatal outcomes in military families despite universal health care coverage. Though the exact underlying cause has not been identified, social determinants of health may uniquely impact military families. The purpose of this study was to qualitatively investigate the potential impact of social determinants of health and the lived experiences of military individuals seeking maternity care in the Military Health System. Materials and methods: This was an Institutional Review Board-approved protocol. Nine providers conducted 31 semi-structured interviews with individuals who delivered within the last 5 years in the direct or purchased care market. Participants were recruited through social media blasts and clinic flyers with both maximum variation and homogenous sampling to ensure participation of diverse individuals. Data were coded and themes were identified using inductive qualitative research methods. Results: Three main themes were identified: Requirements of Military Life (with subthemes of pregnancy notification and privacy during care, role of pregnancy instructions and policies, and role of command support), Sociocultural Aspects of the Military Experience (with subthemes of pregnancy as a burden on colleagues and a career detractor, postpartum adjustment, balancing personal and professional requirements, pregnancy timing and parenting challenges, and importance of friendship and camaraderie in pregnancy), and Navigating the Healthcare Experience (including subthemes of transfer between military and civilian care and TRICARE challenges, perception of military care as inferior to civilian, and remote duty stations and international care). Conclusions: The unique stressors of military life act synergistically with the existing health care challenges, presenting opportunities for improvements in care. Such opportunities may include increased consistency of policies across services and commands. Increased access to group prenatal care and support groups, and increased assistance with navigating the health care system to improve care transitions were frequently requested changes by participants.