A review of the military basic pay table: Analysis in support of the fourteenth quadrennial review of military compensation

Abstract: Rapid increases in inflation since 2020, a strong labor market, together with military recruiting struggles and reported food insecurity among military members, have put a spotlight on military compensation and on the foundational element of the compensation system, military basic pay. The National Defense Authorization Act for 2023 mandated a study of military basic pay, as does the charter of the 14th Quadrennial Review of Military Compensation, the White House–directed commission that studies military compensation. The Fourteenth Quadrennial Review of Military Compensation requested the RAND National Defense Research Institute to conduct such a study. In this report, the authors assess the basic pay tables of junior, midcareer, and senior enlisted personnel and commissioned officers; evaluate the Employment Cost Index (ECI) as a guide to the annual pay raise, as well as alternatives; compare military pay, measured by regular military compensation, with civilian earnings and evaluate the 70th percentile benchmark developed by the Ninth Quadrennial Review of Military Compensation in 2002; and assess pay for service members in critical specialties and whether and how basic pay could be used to address personnel needs in these specialties. The authors also review recent trends in the civilian labor market that might affect recruiting and retention outcomes and the adequacy of military basic pay; develop proposals for change, drawing from past studies and commissions that have assessed military compensation; present findings from discussions with subject-matter experts and a review of relevant academic literature; and analyze pay, personnel, and civilian labor market data.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Policy & Practice

    The ask, care, escort suite of trainings: Initial evaluation of the Army’s primary suicide prevention strategy

    Abstract: The U.S. Army’s Ask, Care, Escort (ACE) suicide gatekeeper training has been the annual requirement for all personnel since 2009; however, this training has never been formally evaluated. The present study evaluated three updated versions of ACE: a training for Army leaders (ACE-Suicide Intervention), a training for basic combat trainees (ACE for Basic Combat Training and One Station Unit Training), and a standard training for all personnel (ACE for the Force). Self-report surveys measured pre- to posttraining changes in objective and subjective knowledge and stigma, as well as preparedness, self-efficacy, and likelihood to engage in gatekeeper behaviors. Implementation outcomes, such as training acceptability, suitability, and usability were also assessed. Across these evaluations, participants reported that knowledge and gatekeeper behaviors significantly improved from pre- to posttraining. Implementation metrics revealed a high degree of acceptability and relevance for all three ACE trainings. Overall, the findings of these evaluations suggest important changes in key suicide prevention outcomes following the ACE suite of trainings. Further longitudinal assessment is needed to establish the full effectiveness of gatekeeper interventions in the Army.