A scoping review of protective factors that contribute to posttraumatic wellbeing for trauma-exposed military service members and Veterans

Abstract: Military service members experience higher levels of cumulative trauma than the general population, increasing their risk of mental health problems. This scoping review synthesizes evidence on protective factors that contribute to posttraumatic wellbeing among military service members and veterans. PubMed and PsycINFO databases were searched using keywords for military/veterans, traumatic event exposure, posttraumatic stress, and wellbeing outcomes (e.g., quality of life [QoL]). Article abstracts and full texts were screened by two reviewers, with a third reviewer resolving conflicts. Inclusion criteria consisted of the following: (a) empirical study, (b) military/veteran sample, (c) exposed to posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) criterion A event, (d) ≥1 protective factor examined, (e) ≥1 wellbeing outcome examined. After data extraction, Bibliometric Network Analysis was used to visualize the topics covered. Literature searches yielded 1,341 articles. Of these, 104 articles were retained after screening. Of the wellbeing outcomes studied, QoL, functioning, and posttraumatic growth were well-researched. Across intervention types (CBT-based, third wave, and complementary), some interventions were efficacious for wellbeing outcomes (mainly QoL), but many had negligible or nonsignificant effects. Other than social support, external resources, and systemic supports were understudied. Intensive interventions and those involving daily practice most effectively promoted wellbeing. Protective factors such as social support, executive functioning, optimism, and system-level resources should be better incorporated into PTSD care for service members/veterans.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Qualitative analysis of the lived experience of reproductive and pediatric health care in the military health care system

    Abstract: Introduction: Persistent inequities exist in obstetric and neonatal outcomes in military families despite universal health care coverage. Though the exact underlying cause has not been identified, social determinants of health may uniquely impact military families. The purpose of this study was to qualitatively investigate the potential impact of social determinants of health and the lived experiences of military individuals seeking maternity care in the Military Health System. Materials and methods: This was an Institutional Review Board-approved protocol. Nine providers conducted 31 semi-structured interviews with individuals who delivered within the last 5 years in the direct or purchased care market. Participants were recruited through social media blasts and clinic flyers with both maximum variation and homogenous sampling to ensure participation of diverse individuals. Data were coded and themes were identified using inductive qualitative research methods. Results: Three main themes were identified: Requirements of Military Life (with subthemes of pregnancy notification and privacy during care, role of pregnancy instructions and policies, and role of command support), Sociocultural Aspects of the Military Experience (with subthemes of pregnancy as a burden on colleagues and a career detractor, postpartum adjustment, balancing personal and professional requirements, pregnancy timing and parenting challenges, and importance of friendship and camaraderie in pregnancy), and Navigating the Healthcare Experience (including subthemes of transfer between military and civilian care and TRICARE challenges, perception of military care as inferior to civilian, and remote duty stations and international care). Conclusions: The unique stressors of military life act synergistically with the existing health care challenges, presenting opportunities for improvements in care. Such opportunities may include increased consistency of policies across services and commands. Increased access to group prenatal care and support groups, and increased assistance with navigating the health care system to improve care transitions were frequently requested changes by participants.