Do drug and opioid use vary by spousal sexual orientation and military status

Abstract: The purpose of the present study was to explore the differences in illicit drug use and opioid misuse according to the sexual orientation of spouses in the military and spouses not in the military. Data were retrieved from the 2015-2019 waves of the National Survey of Drug Use and Health (military n = 905; civilian n = 1,865). Differences in drug use and opioid misuse by sexual orientation and military status were tested in stratified Poisson regression models, adjusting for sociodemographic variables, psychological distress, and health conditions. Any drug use in the past year was higher among spouses of active-duty service members (4.42%) than among spouses of civilians (1.55%, chi(2) = 20.59, p < .001). Any opioid misuse was higher among spouses of active-duty service members (7.29%) than among spouses of civilians (4.29%, chi(2) = 11.01, p = .001). In adjusted models, sexual minority status was a risk factor for drug use, but not opioid misuse, among military spouses; however, sexual minority status was a risk factor for both drug use and opioid misuse among civilian spouses. We showed that illicit drug use among spouses of active-duty service members may be higher than spouses of civilians, especially for sexual minorities; however, sexual minority status may only be a risk factor for civilian couples.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Qualitative analysis of the lived experience of reproductive and pediatric health care in the military health care system

    Abstract: Introduction: Persistent inequities exist in obstetric and neonatal outcomes in military families despite universal health care coverage. Though the exact underlying cause has not been identified, social determinants of health may uniquely impact military families. The purpose of this study was to qualitatively investigate the potential impact of social determinants of health and the lived experiences of military individuals seeking maternity care in the Military Health System. Materials and methods: This was an Institutional Review Board-approved protocol. Nine providers conducted 31 semi-structured interviews with individuals who delivered within the last 5 years in the direct or purchased care market. Participants were recruited through social media blasts and clinic flyers with both maximum variation and homogenous sampling to ensure participation of diverse individuals. Data were coded and themes were identified using inductive qualitative research methods. Results: Three main themes were identified: Requirements of Military Life (with subthemes of pregnancy notification and privacy during care, role of pregnancy instructions and policies, and role of command support), Sociocultural Aspects of the Military Experience (with subthemes of pregnancy as a burden on colleagues and a career detractor, postpartum adjustment, balancing personal and professional requirements, pregnancy timing and parenting challenges, and importance of friendship and camaraderie in pregnancy), and Navigating the Healthcare Experience (including subthemes of transfer between military and civilian care and TRICARE challenges, perception of military care as inferior to civilian, and remote duty stations and international care). Conclusions: The unique stressors of military life act synergistically with the existing health care challenges, presenting opportunities for improvements in care. Such opportunities may include increased consistency of policies across services and commands. Increased access to group prenatal care and support groups, and increased assistance with navigating the health care system to improve care transitions were frequently requested changes by participants.