Racial/ethnic and geographic differences in traumatic brain injury (TBI) service-connected disability determination and monthly compensation among post-9/11 US Veterans

Abstract: Purpose: Veterans who incur a traumatic brain injury (TBI) during active duty service may be eligible to receive service-connected disability (SCD) compensation. This study examined potential racial/ethnic and geographic disparities in TBI SCD determination and overall monthly SCD compensation. Federal Tribal Land (FTL) was incorporated into existing VA geographic designations of urban, rural, highly rural, and US Territories (UST). Methods: The association of race/ethnicity and geographic status with TBI SCD was estimated using logit models. Generalized linear models were used to assess the association of Veteran race/ethnicity and geographic status with overall monthly SCD compensation in 2022. Results: Of the 1,319,590 Veterans with any SCD rating, 7.1% had a TBI SCD determination. Adjusting for demographic and military characteristics, relative to non-Hispanic Whites, Asian American Pacific Islanders (AAPI) (OR 1.19; 95% CI 1.16-1.22) had the highest odds of a TBI SCD, followed by American Indian Alaska Natives (OR 1.12; 95% CI 1.06-1.18). Bivariate analysis showed that relative to urban areas, highly rural (OR 1.44; 95% CI 1.38-1.49) areas had the highest odds of TBI SCD, followed by FTL (OR 1.28; 1.03-1.59). Bivariate analysis indicated that non-Hispanic Blacks ($433; 95% CI 428-439) and UST ($149; 95% CI 92-206) had the highest incremental monthly SCD compensation, while FTL Veterans had decremental compensation (- $80; 95% CI - 157 to - 4). Conclusions: This study found that AAPI and FTL Veterans ranked lower in SCD compensation relative to their likelihood of a TBI SCD. These findings could be due to several factors that warrant further study.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Policy & Practice

    The ask, care, escort suite of trainings: Initial evaluation of the Army’s primary suicide prevention strategy

    Abstract: The U.S. Army’s Ask, Care, Escort (ACE) suicide gatekeeper training has been the annual requirement for all personnel since 2009; however, this training has never been formally evaluated. The present study evaluated three updated versions of ACE: a training for Army leaders (ACE-Suicide Intervention), a training for basic combat trainees (ACE for Basic Combat Training and One Station Unit Training), and a standard training for all personnel (ACE for the Force). Self-report surveys measured pre- to posttraining changes in objective and subjective knowledge and stigma, as well as preparedness, self-efficacy, and likelihood to engage in gatekeeper behaviors. Implementation outcomes, such as training acceptability, suitability, and usability were also assessed. Across these evaluations, participants reported that knowledge and gatekeeper behaviors significantly improved from pre- to posttraining. Implementation metrics revealed a high degree of acceptability and relevance for all three ACE trainings. Overall, the findings of these evaluations suggest important changes in key suicide prevention outcomes following the ACE suite of trainings. Further longitudinal assessment is needed to establish the full effectiveness of gatekeeper interventions in the Army.