Diagnostic accuracy and psychometric performance of two self-report measures of posttraumatic stress disorder in older Veterans

Abstract: The Primary Care PTSD Screen for DSM-5 (PC-PTSD-5) and PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) have demonstrated high levels of diagnostic accuracy and strong psychometric properties across various samples and settings. However, the impact of age on these measures has been underinvestigated. This is problematic, as without accurate measurement, older adults with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) may be vulnerable to misdiagnosis and inappropriate treatment planning. This study examined the diagnostic accuracy of these measures in older (≥ 65 years; n = 192) versus younger (< 65 years; n = 188) veterans to determine whether precision in identifying PTSD was equally strong between groups in a sample of veterans receiving primary care services in a U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs setting. Results indicated that, despite a lower PTSD prevalence among older veterans (9.3% vs. 25.5%), the PC-PTSD-5 performed better among older veterans, AUC = .960, 95% CI [.928, .992], than younger veterans, AUC = .897, 95% CI [.846, .949], z = 2.04, p = .042. A PC-PTSD-5 cutoff score of 4 was optimal for both groups. PCL-5 performance was excellent for both older, AUC = .925, 95% CI [.880, .970], and younger veterans, AUC = .894, 95% CI [.847, .942], z = 0.92, p = .358. Although different optimal cutoff scores were found for older (36) versus younger (34) veterans, these cutoffs were not significantly different from each other or the standard cutoff (33), McNemar tests ps = .125–1.00. Both measures maintain their robust psychometric properties in veterans across the lifespan.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    The impact of exposure to morally injurious events on posttraumatic stress symptoms among Israeli combat Veterans: a longitudinal moderated mediation model of moral injury outcomes and dispositional forgiveness

    Abstract: Background: Exposure to potentially morally injurious events (PMIEs) during military service can lead to moral injury (MI) outcomes and posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS). This longitudinal study examined the relationships between PMIE exposure, MI outcomes, and PTSS among Israeli combat veterans, and the potential protective role of dispositional forgiveness in these associations. Method: Participants were 169 Israeli combat veterans who participated in a six-year longitudinal study with four measurement points (T1: 12 months before enlistment, T2: Six months following enlistment- pre-deployment, T3: 18 months following enlistment- post-deployment, and T4: 28 months following discharge). Participants’ characteristics were assessed via semi-structured interviews (T1) and validated self-report measures (T2-T4) between 2019-2024. Results: Approximately 36% of participants reported exposure to PMIEs during service, with 13% exceeding the clinical threshold for probable PTSD at T4. PMIE-Betrayal at T3 was positively associated with MI outcomes of shame and trust violation at T4. The indirect effect of PMIEs on PTSS through MI outcome-Shame depended on forgiveness levels. Among veterans with low forgiveness, higher exposure to PMIE-Betrayal was associated with increased MI shame, which was linked to more severe PTSS. Conversely, for those with high forgiveness, exposure to PMIE-Self and Other was associated with decreased MI shame and subsequently reduced PTSS. Conclusion: Dispositional forgiveness moderates the relationship between PMIE exposure and MI outcomes, particularly shame, which mediates the development of PTSS. These findings highlight forgiveness as a potential target for intervention in treating moral injury and preventing PTSS among combat veterans.