U.S. Veterans’ reintegration challenges: Policies, impacts, and reforms

Abstract: This paper provides a comprehensive examination of U.S. veterans’ reintegration challenges in the post-2009 era, emphasizing comparative policy initiatives, long-term social impacts, and key legislative reforms. Drawing on federal reports, policy analyses, and statistical data, it offers an overview of the evolving landscape for veterans in domains such as employment, housing, mental health, and justice involvement. The analysis highlights substantial progress in reducing veteran unemployment—reaching historically low rates below the national average—and cutting homelessness by more than half over the past decade through expanded housing vouchers and support services. Despite these gains, persistently high suicide rates underscore the need for enhanced mental health outreach, early intervention, and strengthened community-based prevention. The review of major legislative acts—including the Post-9/11 GI Bill, the VOW to Hire Heroes Act, and the Veterans Treatment Court Coordination Act—reveals an ongoing commitment to supporting veterans’ transition. However, significant gaps persist, particularly for veterans with other-than-honorable discharges, those in rural areas with limited program access, and subgroups at elevated risk for economic or mental health struggles. By comparing best practices domestically and internationally, this paper identifies policy areas ripe for further development: family-inclusive services, expanded justice diversion pathways, broader eligibility for VA benefits, and improved data collection on incarcerated veterans. Ultimately, the findings suggest that sustained, evidence-based investments in veterans’ well-being can help ensure that no service member is left behind, while charting a path toward an inclusive national strategy that maximizes veterans’ long-term potential in civilian life.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Policy & Practice

    The ask, care, escort suite of trainings: Initial evaluation of the Army’s primary suicide prevention strategy

    Abstract: The U.S. Army’s Ask, Care, Escort (ACE) suicide gatekeeper training has been the annual requirement for all personnel since 2009; however, this training has never been formally evaluated. The present study evaluated three updated versions of ACE: a training for Army leaders (ACE-Suicide Intervention), a training for basic combat trainees (ACE for Basic Combat Training and One Station Unit Training), and a standard training for all personnel (ACE for the Force). Self-report surveys measured pre- to posttraining changes in objective and subjective knowledge and stigma, as well as preparedness, self-efficacy, and likelihood to engage in gatekeeper behaviors. Implementation outcomes, such as training acceptability, suitability, and usability were also assessed. Across these evaluations, participants reported that knowledge and gatekeeper behaviors significantly improved from pre- to posttraining. Implementation metrics revealed a high degree of acceptability and relevance for all three ACE trainings. Overall, the findings of these evaluations suggest important changes in key suicide prevention outcomes following the ACE suite of trainings. Further longitudinal assessment is needed to establish the full effectiveness of gatekeeper interventions in the Army.

    Mental Health Peer reviewed