Current perspectives on the mental health of UK military personnel and Veterans

Abstract: Introduction: This narrative review sets out to explore the current literature surrounding the mental health of serving personnel and veterans. Sources of data: UK literature published in peer-reviewed scientific journals and publicly available UK Ministry of Defence reports. Areas of agreement: Evidence suggests that common mental disorders are more prevalent in the UK serving and veteran personnel than in the general population. Risk factors include being female, adverse childhood events, combat exposure, and physical combat injury. Areas of controversy: Post-traumatic stress disorder rates are broadly similar between UK serving personnel and the general population, though certain groups are at increased risk, such as veterans who deployed to Iraq/Afghanistan in combat roles. Growing points: Understanding ways to maximize positive psychological outcomes, address poor sleep, and support those with combat injuries and chronic pain are key priorities for research/interventions. The prevalence of moral injury and military sexual trauma in the UK Armed Forces is currently unknown. Areas timely for developing research: A longitudinal study following recruits including those who are part of the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer/Questioning or other sexualities and gender identities (LGBTQ+) community, or who have a neurodivergent condition, from entry to post-service would enhance our understanding of how serving in the Armed Forces impacts the mental health and wellbeing.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Outcomes from a posttraumatic growth-oriented program among Veterans: A quasi-experimental retrospective study

    Abstract: Objective: The present study is a retrospective quasi-experimental study to evaluate the effectiveness of the Warrior PATHH (WP) program at improving posttraumatic growth (PTG) outcomes and reducing PTSD symptoms compared to a waitlist control among a sample of Veterans. Method: Participants (n = 164) were U.S. military Veterans with a history of trauma. Participants were either undergoing the Warrior PATHH program or a waitlist. Primary outcome measures were administered at baseline and at 90-day follow-up and consisted of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory – Expanded (PTGI-X) and the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). Secondary outcome measures assessed psychosocial functioning and included measures of depression and anxiety symptoms, sleep, wellbeing, and social support. Results: Significant differences were observed between groups on the PTGI-X (F(1, 205) = 23.667, p < .001, partial η2 = 0.103), and the PCL-5 (F(1, 205) = 262.460, p < .001, partial η2 = 0.561) with the WP group showing significant positive psychological change following a traumatic event as measured by the PTGI-X and decreased PTSD symptoms as measured by the PCL-5 compared to those in the waitlist condition. Those in the treatment arm also demonstrated gains to psychosocial functioning. Conclusions: Consistent with previous research, participants in the Warrior PATHH program exhibited significant increases in PTG outcomes, decreased PTSD symptoms, and broad improvements to psychosocial functioning. These findings suggest it is an effective training program to foster PTG outcomes among Veterans. This study is unique as it is the first to compare the effects of WP programming with a sample of waitlisted Veterans.