Current perspectives on the mental health of UK military personnel and Veterans

Abstract: Introduction: This narrative review sets out to explore the current literature surrounding the mental health of serving personnel and veterans. Sources of data: UK literature published in peer-reviewed scientific journals and publicly available UK Ministry of Defence reports. Areas of agreement: Evidence suggests that common mental disorders are more prevalent in the UK serving and veteran personnel than in the general population. Risk factors include being female, adverse childhood events, combat exposure, and physical combat injury. Areas of controversy: Post-traumatic stress disorder rates are broadly similar between UK serving personnel and the general population, though certain groups are at increased risk, such as veterans who deployed to Iraq/Afghanistan in combat roles. Growing points: Understanding ways to maximize positive psychological outcomes, address poor sleep, and support those with combat injuries and chronic pain are key priorities for research/interventions. The prevalence of moral injury and military sexual trauma in the UK Armed Forces is currently unknown. Areas timely for developing research: A longitudinal study following recruits including those who are part of the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer/Questioning or other sexualities and gender identities (LGBTQ+) community, or who have a neurodivergent condition, from entry to post-service would enhance our understanding of how serving in the Armed Forces impacts the mental health and wellbeing.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    The impact of exposure to morally injurious events on posttraumatic stress symptoms among Israeli combat Veterans: a longitudinal moderated mediation model of moral injury outcomes and dispositional forgiveness

    Abstract: Background: Exposure to potentially morally injurious events (PMIEs) during military service can lead to moral injury (MI) outcomes and posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS). This longitudinal study examined the relationships between PMIE exposure, MI outcomes, and PTSS among Israeli combat veterans, and the potential protective role of dispositional forgiveness in these associations. Method: Participants were 169 Israeli combat veterans who participated in a six-year longitudinal study with four measurement points (T1: 12 months before enlistment, T2: Six months following enlistment- pre-deployment, T3: 18 months following enlistment- post-deployment, and T4: 28 months following discharge). Participants’ characteristics were assessed via semi-structured interviews (T1) and validated self-report measures (T2-T4) between 2019-2024. Results: Approximately 36% of participants reported exposure to PMIEs during service, with 13% exceeding the clinical threshold for probable PTSD at T4. PMIE-Betrayal at T3 was positively associated with MI outcomes of shame and trust violation at T4. The indirect effect of PMIEs on PTSS through MI outcome-Shame depended on forgiveness levels. Among veterans with low forgiveness, higher exposure to PMIE-Betrayal was associated with increased MI shame, which was linked to more severe PTSS. Conversely, for those with high forgiveness, exposure to PMIE-Self and Other was associated with decreased MI shame and subsequently reduced PTSS. Conclusion: Dispositional forgiveness moderates the relationship between PMIE exposure and MI outcomes, particularly shame, which mediates the development of PTSS. These findings highlight forgiveness as a potential target for intervention in treating moral injury and preventing PTSS among combat veterans.