More than a score: Evaluating military Veterans' success when applying to medical school

Abstract: Due to the inherent nature of service in both military and medical careers, some veterans are drawn to medicine after completing military service. However, there are significant financial and academic barriers for veterans applying into medical fields. Average grade point average (GPA) and Medical College Admission Test (MCAT) score are two heavily weighted metrics in the medical school application process. Veterans often have less rigorous academic backgrounds and more limited preparation for the MCAT in comparison to traditional medical school applicants. As a result, veterans may be less competitive than traditional applicants through direct comparisons of GPAs and MCAT scor s. The authors' analysis focuses on whether this limitation affected veterans' success in applying to medical school. Using aggregated data from the American Association of Medical Colleges (AAMC), the authors analyzed the average GPAs and MCAT scores of applicants with any military experience (defined as "military applicants") compared to the pool of all applicants from 2018 to 2024. During this period, military applicants to U.S. MD programs had an average GPA that was 0.16 points lower and average MCAT score 3.4 points below the average of all applicants. Despite lower academic metrics, the military applicant acceptance rate to MD programs was 41.7% compared to 40.7% for all applicants. Veterans should not be deterred from seeking a path of service in medicine by below average GPAs or MCAT scores. Medical school admissions over the past 6 years show that medical school admission committees value the perspective, life experience, and skills military veterans bring to medicine despite their lower GPAs and MCAT scores.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Outcomes from a posttraumatic growth-oriented program among Veterans: A quasi-experimental retrospective study

    Abstract: Objective: The present study is a retrospective quasi-experimental study to evaluate the effectiveness of the Warrior PATHH (WP) program at improving posttraumatic growth (PTG) outcomes and reducing PTSD symptoms compared to a waitlist control among a sample of Veterans. Method: Participants (n = 164) were U.S. military Veterans with a history of trauma. Participants were either undergoing the Warrior PATHH program or a waitlist. Primary outcome measures were administered at baseline and at 90-day follow-up and consisted of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory – Expanded (PTGI-X) and the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). Secondary outcome measures assessed psychosocial functioning and included measures of depression and anxiety symptoms, sleep, wellbeing, and social support. Results: Significant differences were observed between groups on the PTGI-X (F(1, 205) = 23.667, p < .001, partial η2 = 0.103), and the PCL-5 (F(1, 205) = 262.460, p < .001, partial η2 = 0.561) with the WP group showing significant positive psychological change following a traumatic event as measured by the PTGI-X and decreased PTSD symptoms as measured by the PCL-5 compared to those in the waitlist condition. Those in the treatment arm also demonstrated gains to psychosocial functioning. Conclusions: Consistent with previous research, participants in the Warrior PATHH program exhibited significant increases in PTG outcomes, decreased PTSD symptoms, and broad improvements to psychosocial functioning. These findings suggest it is an effective training program to foster PTG outcomes among Veterans. This study is unique as it is the first to compare the effects of WP programming with a sample of waitlisted Veterans.