More than a score: Evaluating military Veterans' success when applying to medical school

Abstract: Due to the inherent nature of service in both military and medical careers, some veterans are drawn to medicine after completing military service. However, there are significant financial and academic barriers for veterans applying into medical fields. Average grade point average (GPA) and Medical College Admission Test (MCAT) score are two heavily weighted metrics in the medical school application process. Veterans often have less rigorous academic backgrounds and more limited preparation for the MCAT in comparison to traditional medical school applicants. As a result, veterans may be less competitive than traditional applicants through direct comparisons of GPAs and MCAT scor s. The authors' analysis focuses on whether this limitation affected veterans' success in applying to medical school. Using aggregated data from the American Association of Medical Colleges (AAMC), the authors analyzed the average GPAs and MCAT scores of applicants with any military experience (defined as "military applicants") compared to the pool of all applicants from 2018 to 2024. During this period, military applicants to U.S. MD programs had an average GPA that was 0.16 points lower and average MCAT score 3.4 points below the average of all applicants. Despite lower academic metrics, the military applicant acceptance rate to MD programs was 41.7% compared to 40.7% for all applicants. Veterans should not be deterred from seeking a path of service in medicine by below average GPAs or MCAT scores. Medical school admissions over the past 6 years show that medical school admission committees value the perspective, life experience, and skills military veterans bring to medicine despite their lower GPAs and MCAT scores.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    The impact of exposure to morally injurious events on posttraumatic stress symptoms among Israeli combat Veterans: a longitudinal moderated mediation model of moral injury outcomes and dispositional forgiveness

    Abstract: Background: Exposure to potentially morally injurious events (PMIEs) during military service can lead to moral injury (MI) outcomes and posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS). This longitudinal study examined the relationships between PMIE exposure, MI outcomes, and PTSS among Israeli combat veterans, and the potential protective role of dispositional forgiveness in these associations. Method: Participants were 169 Israeli combat veterans who participated in a six-year longitudinal study with four measurement points (T1: 12 months before enlistment, T2: Six months following enlistment- pre-deployment, T3: 18 months following enlistment- post-deployment, and T4: 28 months following discharge). Participants’ characteristics were assessed via semi-structured interviews (T1) and validated self-report measures (T2-T4) between 2019-2024. Results: Approximately 36% of participants reported exposure to PMIEs during service, with 13% exceeding the clinical threshold for probable PTSD at T4. PMIE-Betrayal at T3 was positively associated with MI outcomes of shame and trust violation at T4. The indirect effect of PMIEs on PTSS through MI outcome-Shame depended on forgiveness levels. Among veterans with low forgiveness, higher exposure to PMIE-Betrayal was associated with increased MI shame, which was linked to more severe PTSS. Conversely, for those with high forgiveness, exposure to PMIE-Self and Other was associated with decreased MI shame and subsequently reduced PTSS. Conclusion: Dispositional forgiveness moderates the relationship between PMIE exposure and MI outcomes, particularly shame, which mediates the development of PTSS. These findings highlight forgiveness as a potential target for intervention in treating moral injury and preventing PTSS among combat veterans.