Fighting for peace within: The existential-relational positions into which we train soldiers and the challenge of their reaggregation into society

Abstract: We train our soldier warriors into a mix of two existential-relational, developmental positions: the contiguous and paranoid-schizoid. Functioning within these positions is adaptive for the task of fighting but not living within peacetime society, where our embrace of the complexities of our moral being-ness is essential for wholesome functioning. Because we do not “untrain” our soldiers with the same commitment of intensity and resources that we apply to training them, our warriors are too often left in a moral in-betweenness which can result in serious psychological issues and greater inclination to do self-harm. While there are programs to address our soldiers’ postfighting problems, they are either reactive rather or far too limited in their scope of assistance. In short, they are inadequate and a shirking of the moral responsibility we have as regular society members to see that untraining or retraining is institutionally prioritized.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Policy & Practice

    The ask, care, escort suite of trainings: Initial evaluation of the Army’s primary suicide prevention strategy

    Abstract: The U.S. Army’s Ask, Care, Escort (ACE) suicide gatekeeper training has been the annual requirement for all personnel since 2009; however, this training has never been formally evaluated. The present study evaluated three updated versions of ACE: a training for Army leaders (ACE-Suicide Intervention), a training for basic combat trainees (ACE for Basic Combat Training and One Station Unit Training), and a standard training for all personnel (ACE for the Force). Self-report surveys measured pre- to posttraining changes in objective and subjective knowledge and stigma, as well as preparedness, self-efficacy, and likelihood to engage in gatekeeper behaviors. Implementation outcomes, such as training acceptability, suitability, and usability were also assessed. Across these evaluations, participants reported that knowledge and gatekeeper behaviors significantly improved from pre- to posttraining. Implementation metrics revealed a high degree of acceptability and relevance for all three ACE trainings. Overall, the findings of these evaluations suggest important changes in key suicide prevention outcomes following the ACE suite of trainings. Further longitudinal assessment is needed to establish the full effectiveness of gatekeeper interventions in the Army.