Individual and organisational factors contributing to the mental health and suicide risk of current and ex-serving Navy clearance divers

Abstract: ObjectiveMilitary service is inherently stressful, and a high prevalence of mental ill-health and suicide is reported among the veteran community. The current study examined the experiences of Navy Clearance Divers and factors that may be related to their mental health and suicide risk.MethodCurrent and ex-serving Australian Clearance Divers (n = 135) completed a mixed-methods survey in June 2021 on the impact of service on their mental health.ResultsFifty-five per cent of participants reported suffering a mental health issue, 40% had considered suicide, and 68% were concerned about another Clearance Diver's suicide risk. Transitioning out of active service presented practical, emotional, and social challenges. Qualitative analysis revealed four organisational factors (organisational culture, leadership, workplace support, and work environment) and five individual factors (attitudes to mental health treatment, experience of trauma, health and behaviour, emotional and social factors through transition, and experience of transition processes) that may be contributing to the poor mental health and high suicide risk.ConclusionsSeveral systemic organisational problems may be contributing to poor mental health and wellbeing within Australian Clearance Divers, and improvements to mental health support and the transition process are required. Defence leadership is committed to enacting systematic change.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Policy & Practice

    Armed Forces Covenant toolkit: Updated edition (2025)

    Abstract: One of the key achievements of Forces in Mind Trust’s (FiMT) Our Community - Our Covenant series of reports, beginning in 2016, has been to establish a toolkit for local authorities to help them develop support for their local Armed Forces Community (AFC). The 2016 report launched the idea of a “core infrastructure”, supported by self-assessment questions and some wider tips. Formal research and informal engagement show that the toolkit still provides an important contribution to successful local delivery of Covenant pledges and wider AFC support. It’s a baseline in the face of ever-present funding stresses and a point of reference when there are changes in member and officer responsibilities. This means it is important that the toolkit remains up to date. It was last reviewed in 2022 and presented as an Annex to FiMT’s research report A Decade of the Covenant. Since then, there has been further research into local support for the Armed Forces Community for the next iteration of the Our Community - Our Covenant series. This updated toolkit reflects these recent findings about local practice as well as developments following the introduction in the Armed Forces Act 2021 of the duty of due regard to the principles of the Covenant in the focus areas of housing, education and healthcare. As with the original document, the toolkit remains targeted at local authorities. It covers their own direct role in supporting the local AFC, but also the crucial activity of convening local partnerships and so enabling effective local collaborative action. The key changes to the core infrastructure and self-assessment cover: (1) More emphasis on embedding AFC support into the mainstream of local authority work. (2) An extended top tips section with more advice based on recent research. (3) We have dropped the descriptive scenarios of challenges that members of the AFC face. These have now been overtaken by analytical scenarios included in the freely available national training material and in the Ministry of Defence’s (MoD) Covenant Legal Duty toolkit, which helps to explain the legal duty aspect of the Covenant. (4) Some additional material about the individual roles, collaboration, communication and vision and commitment elements of the core infrastructure. This toolkit update is being made in spring 2025 at a time when further change in the Covenant environment is likely, with potential extension of the Covenant duty and expected re-organisation in English local government and creation of new combined or strategic authorities. Additional modules could be added to the toolkit to reflect these ongoing policy developments.