Fighting an inner battle: The effects of deployment experiences on ex-military prison staff in England and Wales

Abstract: In 2022, the U.K. Ministry of Justice started fast-tracking veterans into the prison service to reduce the violence in British prisons. These ambitions rest on a fragile evidence base. Not much is known about ex-military prison personnel. Research on the psychological effects of previous military service remains entirely absent. Drawing on 38 semistructured interviews and observations in five English prisons and using Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis, this study explores how deployment experiences influence ex-military prison personnel in their behavior and attitudes at work. In doing so, it expands our understanding of how external factors such as military service impact prison staff's approach to their work and relationship to individuals in prison. Almost all participants reported increased levels of resilience which helped them stay calm during difficult incidents at work. However, my findings show that this resilience was not always authentic nor generalizable to all contexts of their lives. Over 30% of participants suffered from posttraumatic stress symptoms, especially in periods of rest. Additionally, repeated exposure to death and injuries during military deployments desensitized them to violence, leading to emotional disengagement from individuals in prison and a strict focus on discipline. Lastly, my findings show that deployment experiences can lead to a lack of empathy, especially regarding people in prison who self-harm. I discuss policy implications around mental health support for ex-military prison staff in the prison service and adjustments to prison officer training.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Policy & Practice

    The ask, care, escort suite of trainings: Initial evaluation of the Army’s primary suicide prevention strategy

    Abstract: The U.S. Army’s Ask, Care, Escort (ACE) suicide gatekeeper training has been the annual requirement for all personnel since 2009; however, this training has never been formally evaluated. The present study evaluated three updated versions of ACE: a training for Army leaders (ACE-Suicide Intervention), a training for basic combat trainees (ACE for Basic Combat Training and One Station Unit Training), and a standard training for all personnel (ACE for the Force). Self-report surveys measured pre- to posttraining changes in objective and subjective knowledge and stigma, as well as preparedness, self-efficacy, and likelihood to engage in gatekeeper behaviors. Implementation outcomes, such as training acceptability, suitability, and usability were also assessed. Across these evaluations, participants reported that knowledge and gatekeeper behaviors significantly improved from pre- to posttraining. Implementation metrics revealed a high degree of acceptability and relevance for all three ACE trainings. Overall, the findings of these evaluations suggest important changes in key suicide prevention outcomes following the ACE suite of trainings. Further longitudinal assessment is needed to establish the full effectiveness of gatekeeper interventions in the Army.